Laserfiche WebLink
Wood stated that the PUD reflects the potential of reserving an access easement for the <br />purpose of crossing the Goodhue Ditch at some point in the future and gaining access to <br />the north. Such access may connect to a collector loop road, which would align with <br />Hecla Drive as constructed on the east side of SH 42. <br /> <br />Wood noted that the Planning Commission approved the application with 11 conditions <br />of approval. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the proposed PUD meets all Commercial Design Standards & <br />Guidelines with the exception of two areas. The first is the parking setback from the <br />south property line of 8' where 10' is required. The Planning Commission supported the <br />8' setback as the landscape planting strip is in compliance with the CDDSG. The second <br />is that the building eaves will project into the setback area. The Planning Commission <br />supported the encroachment, as the eaves do not intrude into the drainage and utility <br />easements. <br /> <br />Wood noted the revised Final PUD Development Plan reflects the applicant will provide <br />an underground 48" diameter reinforced concrete pipe that will pipe the ditch across the <br />westerly portion of the property, which will correspond to the area of Phase I. <br />However, the Planning Commission was divided on this issue and the majority <br />recommended that the City accept a cash-in-lieu fee rather than Tract A based upon the <br />issues of use and maintenance. <br /> <br />Wood stated that Staff recommended the applicant provide an evaluation from an arborist <br />on the health and potential longevity of the trees in the ditch. A report from Hayes Tree <br />Services reflects that a substantial number of tress would have to be removed. <br />Wood stated that currently, the only maintenance performed is by the Ditch Company. <br />The applicant agreed to assume maintenance of the ditch, which would include irrigation <br />of existing trees, removal of debris and limbs, but not maintenance of the pipe or <br />functions of the ditch company. <br /> <br />Wood noted that in lieu of the dedication, the applicant provided an alternative plan that <br />would remove all existing trees and vegetation and re-channel the open ditch along the <br />north property line. No piping of the ditch or crossing structure would be provided. Staff <br />requested the applicant provide the current fair market value for the property as a basis to <br />determine what the cash payment would be. Wood stated that if the alternative plan were <br />accepted for dedication, the Planning Commission would recommend a condition that the <br />City assumes no maintenance of either the pipe or landscaping within the tract. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the Final PUD reflects a reduction in parking spaces from 57 to 54, <br />which provides additional maneuvering area out of a dead-end drive aisle. Wood noted <br />that the Planning Commission recommended that the applicant seek a shared parking plan <br />to better use the under-utilized parking areas in Christopher Plaza. <br /> <br />Wood noted that the final PUD plan is in compliance with the CDDSG landscape <br />requirements. There are two minor modifications to the landscape plan. The first is to <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />