City Council Minutes 2000 03 21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

collector road would not likely bisect this parcel. However, it is Staff's position that this proposal is obligated to construct or demonstrate how the obligation to construct the collector loop road, which will be mutually shared by all parties subject to the development standards of the General Development Plan, would be accomplished. All parcels are to be reviewed for their compliance with an implementation of the General Development Plan. Wood stated that the majority of the land that would convey the conceptual alignment of the collector loop is on the west side of Highway 42. These properties are unincorporated and held by owners who have stated no intent or obligation to abide by the provisions of the General Development Plan. Davidson called for Applicant presentation. Hale Kell, 355 South Boulder Road, stated that he is the applicant, a resident of Louisville and maintains his medical office in Louisville. He stated he is an optometrist and has had an office in Louisville since 1992. Mr. Kell noted that he finds it necessary to expand his office and that he would like to purchase a site where he can relocate. He stated that he was not aware of the collector route and feared that it might jeopardize the project. He asked Council for direction in this matter. Eric Hartronft, 801 Main Street, stated that he is the Architect for the project. He asked the Council to look at the project on its merits as it relates to the general development plan. Hartronft stated that Mr. Kell is looking for high quality, low-density development that would meet his needs. He stated that the proposal is for an office park, low density with 44% open space dedication on the site. With regard to the architectural aspect, Hartronft stated they propose a mix of buildings with seven building sites and a variety of building sizes, all of residential scale. He stated the development would occur over a period of time beginning at Highway 42 and continuing to the west. With respect to access, Hartronft noted that in 1991, CDOT and the City of Louisville decided upon the Right-in/Right-out Left-in configuration. He stated that they would proceed with a full traffic study if Council looks favorably upon this development plan. With respect to the Hecla Drive Loop, Hartronft stated that two properties are still within the county that may not be annexed or developed. He asked Council for input on the proposal, whether they support the density, the unresolved issue with regard to the Hecla Drive Loop, and the acceptability of the open space dedication. Mayer stated his concern was that only half of the land is within the City. He noted that he was not concerned with the potential use, but that he would like more information from Staff regarding the access. He also stated that perhaps a new zoning would be appropriate. Howard stated that he liked the proposed architecture of the buildings, the buffering and density. With respect to the access plan, Howard noted that he was concerned about the peak traffic hours on Highway 42. He stated that with regard to connection with Hecla Drive, most of the proposed land is not in the City of Louisville. He noted that if Council