Planning Commission Minutes 2007 06 14

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes JUNE 14, 2007 Page 10 of 13 requested relief based upon exceeding both the number of required trees and the minimum length of the landscape buffer. . The applicant is required to notify any mineral estate owners associated with the subject parcel, which has not been done at this time. Staff recommends a condition of preliminary approval that a certification of notice be provided to staff prior to or in conjunction with the submittal of a final subdivision plat and final PUD development plan. . Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: i. The PUD development plan shall be revised to reflect either the elimination of the easterly access on Cherry Street, or relocate same to a westerly location as acceptable to the Department of Public Works. 11. The applicant shall provide certification of notice to all mineral interests prior to or in conjunction with the submittal of a final subdivision plat and final PUD development plan. 111. The applicant shall meet the required public use dedication by the payment of a cash-in-lieu payment equivalent to 12% of the appraised value of the land at the time of subdivision. Such payment shall be made prior to issuance of a building permit. Commission Questions of Staff: Sheets discussed with staff the buffer requirement between the two properties, if the property owner had been notified and the cash-in-lieu payment. Wood explained the IDDSG buffer requirements and the relief that the applicant is requesting. He also stated the property owner had been notified as part of the required 500' radius notification area. He stated the cash-in-lieu payment would be handled through the Land Management Department. Deborski requested additional information about the adjoining property and why it is zoned agricultural and if there are any potential access issues for the property owner. Wood stated that at the time of annexation the property was zoned agricultural and the access issues for that site has been address with the CTC Filing NO.2 as well as CTC Filing NO.3. Loo requested color samples and material board for the final application review. Hartman discussed Condition # 1 with Staff. Wood explained the condition is at the request of the Public Works Department and the applicant would be working with that department to address the location of that access point. Applicant Presentation: Jim Vasbinder, Etkin Johnson Group, 1512 Larimer St, Denver, CO stated the following: . The proposed building will be a mirror image of the building being built at 1775 Cherry. . The intent was to design a building to be used for flex use and it is a spec building with no specific tenant at this time. . He stated he is in contact with the Public Works Department addressing the third (3rd) access point. . He also stated his attempt to contact the property owner to the south but has not received any return phone calls.