Laserfiche WebLink
Similar repairs should also be considered over the Porch, since those rafters are also not <br />compliant with Code. <br />"Over the two smaller west portions of the house, the roof framing appears to be <br />functioning well without any signs of distress or deterioration. No repairs appear to be <br />necessary although a more thorough investigation may reveal other deficiencies." <br />CONTRACTOR REVIEW: <br />The Planning Division and the Chief Building Official (CBO) contacted and met on site <br />with three (3) qualified contractors to discuss the HSA findings. Each contractor <br />commented on the extent of the project and stated the structural engineer has provided <br />a great level of detail on the drawings. At the time of the writing of this report, two of the <br />three contactors submitted bids. It is anticipated the third contractor will submit a bid <br />which staff will provide at the HPC meeting. One contractor provided a bid on a design <br />he believes will work outside of the structural engineer's request. <br />Copies of the bids are attached and following is a summary outline of the bids. <br />Raimo Construction, Inc. <br />Raimo Construction provided a bid package based only on the engineering drawings <br />without checking any of the existing conditions. Due to unfortunate timing, Raimo <br />Construction was unable to visit the structure. <br />Scope: <br />A. Foundation work per plans $11,850 <br />• Cut and remove concrete slab <br />• Pour seven concrete piers <br />B. Alterations to Main Roof per plans $27,675 <br />• Remove cedar shakes and asphalt shingles <br />• Remove sheathing <br />• Install new roof shingle <br />• Disposal of all construction debris <br />C. Alterations to front and rear lower roof areas per plans $12,150 <br />• Remove cedar shakes and asphalt shingles <br />• Remove sheathing <br />• Install new roof shingle <br />• Disposal of all construction debris <br />Total $51,675 <br />Monies from the HPF are not eligible for replacement of the asphalt shingles The <br />contractor did not provide a breakdown of the cost for the replacement shingles. Staff <br />recommends the HPC give staff the authority to request a rebid from the contractor prior <br />to Council. <br />Westmark Design and Construction, LLC <br />Westmark provided a bid which provides an alternative design to the design <br />recommended by JVA. In Westmarks bid they state "Working in Strict accordance to <br />the plans will require dismantling of the drywall, some electrical, interior trim, asbestos <br />covered HVAC ductwork and furnace, concrete floor in basement and then pouring <br />4 <br />