My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 05 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
1/30/2004 11:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/2/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />May 2, 2000 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />dedication for right-of-way, and the basis for calculating the fee in-lieu of land <br />dedication. <br /> <br />With regard to the outlot dedication, Wood stated that the amended 1996 agreement <br />required the dedication of a 2,772 square foot outlot for right-of-way purposes. Wood <br />noted that Staff has met with the applicant and has reduced the size of the outlot by half, <br />to 1,380 square feet. If the 96th Street Connection does not go through, the outlot would <br />revert back to lot 3. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the cash in-lieu payment has never been paid to the City and that the <br />1980 Subdivision Agreement required the payment, based upon 12% of the "total <br />appraised value," be paid two years from the date of the agreement. Wood noted that the <br />City Attorney has stated that, since no appraisal has ever been submitted to the City as a <br />basis to quantify the cash in-lieu fee, the required appraisal must consider the value of all <br />existing subdivision improvements. Wood stated that as a condition of approval, Staff <br />recommends that the required appraisal reflect all subdivision improvements currently <br />associated with the subject property, and that payment of the fee be required prior to <br />recordation of the plat and/or PUD. <br /> <br />With respect to the yard/bulk requirements, Wood stated that the requested exceptions to <br />the district requirements involve reduced setbacks. The maximum lot coverage <br />requirement (30%) of the underlying RL zoning district is not being relaxed through this <br />request. The applicant has minimized the amount of setback which varies from the RL <br />Zone District. <br /> <br />Wood stated that as originally platted in 1980, all lots (Lots 1-5) met or exceeded the <br />minimum area and lot frontage requirements of the RL Zone District. As replatted in <br />1981, Lots 3 through 6 were approved with smaller areas and lot frontages. The 25-foot <br />setback from Bella Vista Drive is the most important because of the higher volume of <br />traffic on the roadway. That setback is not reduced through the PUD. A series of 5' <br />setbacks have been increased to 7' setbacks. <br /> <br />Wood noted that the maximum building height has been reduced from the permitted 35- <br />feet to 30-feet for the development, which is more in scale with the surrounding <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the only fence design requirement more restrictive than the underlying <br />zoning regulations would be to limit fencing along Bella Vista Drive to a maximum of <br />42-inches in height and not less than 80 percent open. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.