Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Louisville City Council Meeting <br />February 15, 2005 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />Assistant City Manager for Governmental Relations Heather Balser reported on the red- <br />line copy of the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Town of Superior. <br /> <br />Changes to the document include specifying that "certificates of occupancy are issued for <br />at least 125,000 SF of retail, sales tax generating development, before "certificates of <br />occupancy are issued for more than 30 percent of the total number of permitted <br />residential dwelling units or 500 dwelling units, whichever is more ..Section A3b )." The <br />verbiage is repeated throughout the phasing plan provision. The agreement was amended <br />to state that Louisville shall not solicit retail businesses locating and operating in Superior <br />by incentives within five years of the issuance of certificates of occupancy for 125,000 <br />SF of retail development on the South property. The same clause has been inserted <br />respective to Superior on not soliciting within Louisville's jurisdiction. The City <br />Attorney reviewed the document and offered comments and four suggested revisions. <br /> <br />Mayer Sisk called for public comments. There were no comments. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk noted the City of Louisville has worked with the Town of Superior for some <br />time. There is agreement for certificates of occupancy for at least 125,000 SF of retail. <br />He voiced his satisfaction with the progress that has been made. <br /> <br />City Manager Bill Simmons addressed the part of the agreement which pertains to the <br />multi-tiered Planned Development process as proposed by the Town of Superior. He <br />noted there would be one additional step, which would be the final development plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk stated the agreement states there "shall" be a minimum of 125,000 SF of <br />development of retail on the South Property. He asked City Attorney Light if the Town <br />of Superior would be in violation of the agreement if that amount of retail was not <br />developed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light stated that technically, the Town of Superior would be in violation of <br />the agreement. He explained the method of identifying the square footage at the <br />maximum density for the property. The intent of the agreement is for the identified <br />square footage to be carried through to the final development plan. He suggested adding a <br />statement "with approval at preliminary and final." <br /> <br />Superior Town Manager Bruce Williams outlined the process the Town of Superior <br />follows on any development project. He stated it is the Town's intention to follow the <br />Intergovernmental Agreement. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council member Brown moved for Council approval of the first amendment <br />to the Biella Menkick IGA, with the Town of Superior and authorization for the Mayor to <br />sign the agreement, seconded by Council member Levihn. <br /> <br />10 <br />