City Council Minutes 2000 06 20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting June 20, 2000 Page 9. Geil stated that he was referring to the original 1981 PUD for the five-lot parcel. MOTION: Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution No. 22, Series 2000, with the amendments on setbacks recommended by Staff, seconded by Howard. Keany stated that he did not agree .with the cash in-lieu being at current value. Sisk suggested that the current appraisal be subsequent to June 20, 2000. Light stated that the Ordinance itself is silent, however the 1996 agreement uses the phrase most "recent appraised value." Sisk offered a friendly amendment to the motion that the appraisal would be a current appraisal and would be within two months prior to payment. Mayer and Howard accepted the amendment. Brown asked if the applicant could have moved forward at any time. Geil stated that the 25' setback prohibited the applicant from going forward. Brown offered a friendly amendment that the Council and the applicant reach some middle ground with respect to the cash-in lieu dedication for recent property values. Mayer did not accept the amendment. Brown moved to amend the motion to change the value to exclude the improvements, seconded by Keany. Mayer stated that the reason he could not accept the amendment was that the applicant should not have it both ways, cash in-lieu value at 1996 appraisal, and exceptions to setbacks. He felt that this should be treated as a new PUD. and the cash in-lieu should reflect the current conditions. Howard asked Tom Phare, Public Works Director about the outlot and if there was some agreement with regard to the size of the outlot to accommodate the 96th connection. Phare stated that the larger outlot dedication was a request, and not presented as a demand. It was created, possibly without the understanding of the impact to the lot with setbacks. Later on it was identified that a parcel could be used for the right-of-way 9