My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2012 02 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2012 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2012 02 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:32 PM
Creation date
3/21/2012 3:17:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/21/2012
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2012 02 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 21, 2012 <br /> Page 10 of 14 <br /> Fleming stated staff is waiting for Council direction on whether the time they were out of <br /> compliance should be held against them and the fund held for them be used for other <br /> purposes. City Attorney Light explained the franchise agreement contract with CCTV <br /> had no guarantee for funding or annual appropriations for funding. <br /> Councilor Loo asked if there is an inventory of CCTV's equipment and an estimate on <br /> its value. Public Relations Manager Muth explained staff is recommending donating the <br /> equipment to CCTV or to the Catalyst School. <br /> Councilor Loo asked what a head-in is, and what would it cost to move it to the CCTV <br /> studio. Public Relations Manager stated the head-end in is where Comcast broadcasts <br /> from. Comcast has estimated the cost of moving the head in at $17,000. <br /> Mr. Schwartz explained CCTV is working with the City of Lafayette to move the head-in <br /> at no cost to the City of Lafayette or CCTV. The problem of having the head-in at the <br /> Louisville City Hall is a delayed broadcast and by moving it to Lafayette, it can be easily <br /> accessed to broadcast live programs. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> Councilor Sackett felt CCTV should be allowed to use the broadcast channel and the <br /> PEG fees should be used to upgrade the Louisville City Hall facilities. Councilor Dalton <br /> • asked whether there is a timeline for moving the head-in. Mr. Schwartz estimated a six- <br /> month process. <br /> Councilor Keany felt CCTV performed the audit in good faith and the City should honor <br /> their commitment to CCTV. Councilor Yarnell agreed. <br /> Councilor Loo supported ending the City's involvement in the CCTV Public Access <br /> Television and releasing the PEG funds and donating the equipment to CCTV. Mayor <br /> Muckle also supported releasing the PEG funds and the equipment. He agreed with Mr. <br /> Sobel in the value of community television. Councilor Dalton also supported releasing <br /> funds and the equipment to CCTV. He felt the City should sever their contractual <br /> relationship with CCTV. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Alan Sobel, 1408 Kennedy Avenue, Louisville, CO noted the City's contract with CCTV <br /> stipulated the board be comprised of Louisville residents. The current board is made up <br /> of non-Louisville residents. <br /> There was considerable discussion relative to whether PEG fees were due for all of <br /> 2011 and whether PEG fees are due for through May of 2012. City Attorney Light <br /> outlined the process, should Council decide to sever its contract with CCTV. <br /> There was Council consensus for the City to sever its contract with CCTV, donate the <br /> • <br /> equipment purchased by CCTV with PEG funds to CCTV, and release the funds, which <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.