Laserfiche WebLink
Agency -wide Conclusion — Needed Capital investments Are Modest. Of the four <br />affordable housing properties (i,e. non - public housing and non -tax credit properties), the <br />total estimated rehabilitation requirements are estimated by staff at $295,000 or an <br />average of $5,628 per unit. Similarly, Hillside Square, the public housing property, has <br />only $2,077 per unit capital needs. The tax credit properties have required replacement <br />reserves that have annually required deposits that are expensed and then the capital <br />improvements are drawn upon with approval of the tax credit partner and lender. <br />Regal Square is LHA's largest and strongest property and is supported by HUD HAP <br />subsidies to income - qualified tenants. Regal Square is typically LHA's most profitable <br />property. Regal Square's annual net operating income (net income plus depreciation less <br />non - routine maintenance costs) covers its debt service by more than three tunes. <br />Moreover, Regal Square shows a significant $623,114 "due from other funds" current <br />asset that indicates this property is a cash source for covering costs in other areas of the <br />Authority's operations. Regal Square has a $6,667 per unit capital need estimate and <br />with its very modest debt of $177,480, the property's leverage could be increased. Much <br />of this capital need per unit accounts for major rehabilitation needed in two units that are <br />degrading quickly due to ground water level changes and building settling damage. <br />If at any time LHA was considering acquisition of a significant property or wanted to <br />develop additional affordable housing, the "equity" in Regal Square could be capitalized <br />by including it in a LIHTC partnership with the new acquisition or development. Such <br />combination would need to be approved by HUD for change of ownership from the <br />Authority to a tax credit partnership controlled by LHA. <br />Lilac Place and Regal Court 11 are small properties each with significant debt. <br />Neither property has a formal subsidy source but some of their tenants appear to use <br />Section 8 housing choice vouchers. Both properties are burdened with debt, $456,286 <br />and $466,776, respectively, as of year -end 2010. <br />This debt burden equates to $38,024 per unit for Lilac Place and $46,677 per unit for <br />Regal Court IL Annual debt service for each property is $4,022 and $3,550 per unit, <br />respectively, Lilac Place's 2010 operating income was $8,653 and Regal Court II's was <br />$8,760. After scheduled debt service each property generated $4,631 and $5,210, <br />respectively, to cover operating costs and extraordinary maintenance /repairs. <br />One reason the annual debt service appears high is that the existing Wells Fargo loan for <br />each property is a 20 -year amortization. Typically, housing authorities use 30 -year <br />amortization debt if available to provide lower rents to needy tenants, and to have more <br />cash flow for repairs and investments in the property. It is, of course, important to match <br />the useful life of the property with its debt amortization rate. <br />Acme Place is a small 4 -unit property with no debt. It generates reasonably adequate <br />revenue to cover its costs. Its capital needs of $6,250 per unit appear manageable from <br />cash flow in future years. A small amount of debt (approximately $140,000) could be <br />supported by the property's operations if necessary. <br />Louisville Housing Authority Page 4 <br />Portfolio Analysis Summary Report <br />19 <br />