My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Louisville Housing Authority Agenda and Packet 2012 04 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HOUSING AUTHORITY
>
2012 Louisville Housing Authority Agendas and Packets
>
Louisville Housing Authority Agenda and Packet 2012 04 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:18:05 PM
Creation date
4/20/2012 2:36:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LHAPKT 2012 04 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Steve presented the high points of the last report. The LHA portfolio is made up of 3 categories; <br />4 affordable housing properties that do not have specific requirements on them the way public <br />housing does where. HUD provides a monthly subsidy. One property within that has the section <br />8 new construction subsidy. Regal Square is a Section 8 new construction. The residents there <br />qualify to get the subsidy, a benefit relative to the market rent that HUD feels is the difference <br />between what they can pay. Fair market rents are calculated by HUD. <br />Of those 4 properties, Regal Square is the largest, and has Section 8. Lilac Place and Regal Court <br />2 are smaller and have debt on them. In the past, it has barely covered the debt service. Acme <br />has four units and no debt. On a whole they are operating fairly well. Regal Square carries <br />them. The two low income housing tax credit projects, including Lydia Morgan (just coming up <br />on the 15 year compliance period) has to be managed so that the tax credit investor can recapture <br />and pay back the treasury for their tax credits. That is now ending and the investors want to exit <br />the properties. The investors and JP Morgan own 99% of partnership. Louisville Housing <br />Authority owns 1%. In order to get out of thatFartnership, you transfer that interest to LHA or <br />the BCHA, and refinance the debt. January 3` , 2013, there is a note that has to be refinanced. <br />The other tax credit property is Sunnyside; the East Street Partnership, has just about come up to <br />its 10 years. It may be that you can get the tax credit investors to exit early. Those two tax credit <br />properties need to be resituated and any rehabilitation should be done at that time. <br />The Hillside property has 13 units of public housing. <br />On the whole the 116 units are operating reasonably well. It's a very small portfolio. There is <br />not a tremendous amount of value that could be leveraged to do other development. There is not <br />a lot of room within the balance sheet to grow the portfolio. <br />BCHA is trying to build their portfolio to compete more effectively and to delivery services for <br />their residents. They are doing this on your behalf with a contract that they could walk away <br />from, if they wanted to, within 60 days. <br />We work for BCHA and we also work for LHA. Our business is to tell you the facts. For your <br />city and your organization, there are advantages to potential synergies that BCHA has as a result <br />of the portfolio analysis coming up. They are doing the second round of financing for the <br />Josephine Commons property and you can include properties in that tax credit partnership that <br />could potentially include LHA properties in that cost. <br />Another opportunity is that BCHA has two bond issues with higher rates outstanding; that are <br />now in the position to be refinanced. The refinancing that you are looking at relative to Regal <br />Square and Regal Court II and Lilac, needs to be refinanced and could be rolled into that cost at <br />the same time. The one piece of debt you do have is amortizing in 20 years, a good thing as you <br />want to get out of debt as soon as possible, a bad thing because it raises the debt service <br />requirement. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.