My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 02 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2012 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 02 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:46 AM
Creation date
5/7/2012 11:34:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2012 02 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 12, 2012 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />and Recreation Department to finalize the public land dedication prior to Final Plat <br />and PUD submittal.” <br />McCartney clarified the concern regarding Christopher Village with the following: <br />according to the Traffic Study included in the submittal and reviewed by the Public <br />Works Department, the traffic engineer does not believe there will be a detrimental <br />impactcreated with eastbound vehicles on South Boulder Road turning into <br />Christopher Village. <br />Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 29, Series 2011 with the following <br />conditions: <br />1.The applicant shall continue to work with the Public Works Department on <br />alternative design considerations for intersection turning radii prior to the Final <br />Plat and PUD submittal. <br />2.The applicant shall continue to work with the Parks and Recreation Department <br />to finalize the public land dedicationprior to Final Plat and PUD submittal. <br />3.The applicant shall continue to work with the Davidson Highline and Goodhue <br />Ditch companies on the required ditch easements and design. Final <br />acceptance of the easements will be required prior to final submittal. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Brauneis, Russell, Tengler, Lipton, Moline and O’Connell discussed with staff their <br />concerns regarding the four (4) roadway options. McCartney clarified their specific <br />questions. McCartney summarized with a review of Option #2 as the preferred option. <br />The Commission had no additional questions regarding Tract “O” or the intersection <br />concern at Christopher Village. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Rick Brew, RMCS, Inc. briefly discussed the three identified concerns from the <br />previous meeting. <br />Commission questions ofapplicant: <br />As new members to the Commission, Moline and Tengler asked questions for <br />clarification regarding the street design, locations of buildings, the proposed <br />underpass and Tract “O”. <br />Public Comment: <br />None heard. <br />Summary Comments and Request from Staffand Applicant: <br />None heard. <br />Closed Public Hearing – Planning Commission Discussion: <br />Russell stated he felt Option #1 could work as a roadway design and he understands <br />why Option #2 is appropriate. He also stated the volume traffic on South Boulder <br />Road will monitor the traffic into Christopher Village. <br />Brauneis stated he was surprised to hear about the Trailhead proposal. He stated he <br />is not concerned with a straight path. <br />Tengler stated he is comfortable with Option #2. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.