My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 04 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 04 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:09:16 PM
Creation date
5/8/2012 9:06:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2012 04 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Boulder County gives 1931 as the date of construction for both the house and the office. However, the <br />County has been frequently been found to be in error with respect to the dates of construction for <br />Louisville properties, and the County has been known to give a remodel date as the date of original <br />construction. In this case, the 1948 County Assessor card states that the house was constructed in 1931, <br />and that it was 37 years old in 1948. However, both of these pieces of information cannot be true. Either <br />the County meant to give 1911 as the year of construction, and to say that the house was 37 years old in <br />1948, or the County meant to say that the house was constructed in 1931 and it was 17 years old in <br />1948. Also, the evidence that has been gathered is that the office was constructed in the 1940s, not <br />1931. <br /> <br />Related to this discussion is the issue of the existence of the store, which was on the south side of the <br />property until at least 1936. Information about when it was torn down could not be located. However, <br />some might say that the house could not have been fully remodeled to look as it does now while the <br />store was still there. <br /> <br />All things considered, the most likely scenario appears to be that the original part of the house was <br />constructed in the early 1900s and perhaps as early as 1903, when the Alleras purchased this property <br />for their home, particularly since they were living in Barclay Place in 1904. It appears to have <br />been remodeled at some point. This could have happened in 1931, as the County says, or in a different <br />year. June Enrietto, who was born in 1926 , has stated that it has been a stucco house that looks as it <br />does now for as long as she can remember. Mary Anne La Salle Patete, who lived in the house as a child <br />from 1943 to 1945, also stated that she recalls that in 1943, it was a stucco house that looks much as it <br />does now. She also believes that her father did not do anything to greatly alter the house while her <br />family owned it. Unfortunately, there are no members of the extended Allera or Fenolia families left <br />who might remember the history of this property. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The preceding research is based on a review of relevant and available online County property records, census <br />records, oral history interviews, Louisville directories, and Louisville Historical Museum maps, files, obituary <br />records, and historical photographs from the collection of the Louisville Historical Museum.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.