My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 04 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 04 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:09:16 PM
Creation date
5/8/2012 9:06:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2012 04 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
O ldLouisvilleInn –Preservation/Re h abilita tion/Addition 04/10/12 Page 3 of 3 pages <br />limitationsofmass,scale,numberofstories ,andother potential designrestrictions imposedbytheHPC )wouldqualifyforthisnewconstructionincentive? <br />Section7,(b )indicatesthat “Theselimitationsmaybeexceededupon <br />recommendationofthe HistoricPreservationCommissionandapprovalbyCity <br />Councilupona showing of extraordinary circumstance .…” <br />Question #4 :Basedonthe information submittedherein,doestheHPC &Council <br />believethatthe p reservation/rehabilitation andadditionprojectfor theOldLouisville Innbuildingwouldqualify as “showingof extraordinarycircumstance ”tobeeligible <br />forexceedingthemaximumamountsindicatedinSection7(a)?Ifnot,whatwould <br />beconsidered as “showingof extraordinarycircumstance ”inmakingthe det erminationthatt hemaximumamountsshouldbeexceededforaparticular <br />project? <br />Question#5:Asyouknow,and that Councilisaware,Garretthasalreadyinvested <br />hundreds ofthousandsofdollarsrehabilitati ng theexistingbuilding.Canthe <br />matchingrequirementbesatisfiedthroughdocumentationofpreviousexpenditures ontheproperty whichconformtothe matching fundrequirement? <br />WeandourClientunderstandthattheHPCandtheCityCouncilcannotmakeany bindingobligationsbasedonthistypeofprelimi naryreview,priortolandmarkingof <br />aproperty.However,wedobelievethatthereisenough information hereinforboth ofthesebodiestogiveMr.McCarthysomeguidance regardingthe interpretation of <br />theResolution,andhowthe HPF g rants mightbeadministeredto e nable aproject <br />topreservetheOldLouisvilleInn ,and help supportthislongstandinglocalbusiness . <br />Basedon the determinationsthatcanbemadea tthisstage,Garrettwilldecide <br />whethertomoveforwardwiththere h abilitation /preservationproject,andwhatthe scopeoftheprojectwil linc ludebasedon the likelihoodoffunding toanadequate <br />level.Onbehalfofourclientandourselves,wegreatlyappreciateyourtimeand <br />attentiontothisimportantmatterregardingthepr eservationofoneofLouisville ’s h istoriclandmarkproperties . <br />Thankyou .Welookforwardtoyourresponses. <br />Sincerely, <br />J.Erik Hartronft,AIA,LEED ®AP <br />pc GarrettMcCarthy,OldLouisvilleInn File –Proj#9968 :C ity Corresp ondence <br />M:\_MAIN_065 \_Proj \9968 -OL I \Project Admin \Corr espondence \12 -041012 _Louisvill ePlanning -HistoricGr ants .do c
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.