My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2012 05 07
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2012 05 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:35 PM
Creation date
5/8/2012 9:15:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2012 05 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Performance Measures for Highway 42 <br />(continued) <br />Goal Performance Measures <br />Level 1 Level 2 <br />Provide a supportive transportation <br />system that enables urban <br />revitalization and encourages private <br />investment <br />Is the intersection design consistent with the Highway <br />42 Revitalization Plan? <br />To what degree is the alternative consistent with the <br />Highway 42 Revitalization Plan? <br />Provide efficient access in strategic <br />locations for proposed land uses <br />Does the intersection accommodate an appropriate <br />level of access to the envisioned land uses? <br />How does the alternative design provide opportunities <br />to leverage investment outside of the ROW? <br />How does the corridor alternative accommodate an <br />appropriate level of access to the envisioned land uses? <br />Balance regional mobility and <br />community livability <br />How long will a trip take on the corridor? <br />Accommodate future regional transit <br />plans <br />Can the intersection accommodate adopted regional <br />transit plans? <br />Does the alternative meet future transportation <br />demand? <br />How does the corridor alternative adequately address <br />future transportation needs? <br />How does the corridor alternative accommodate <br />adopted regional transit plans? <br />Consider and balance the impacts <br />upon the natural, social and cultural <br />resources <br />Does the alternative require the relation of structures <br />of 4(f) properties? <br />Will private or public land be converted to transportation <br />uses? If so, how much land will be converted to <br />transportation uses? <br />Promote regional trail connectivity <br />within the study area <br />Can regional trail connectivity be accommodated by <br />the section? <br />Where are additional trail connections provided along <br />the corridor? <br />Design environmentally sustainable <br />solutions <br />Will there be impacts to drainage facilities or utilities <br />that could be relocated? <br />Are there any connections that cannot be <br />accommodated? <br />How does landscaping and future maintenance costs <br />compare to existing costs? <br />Develop creative, cost - effective and <br />implementable solutions for immediate <br />and long -term needs <br />How much will the alternative cost? <br />What is the likelihood that the alternative will be <br />funded? <br />Can the alternative be implemented in phases? <br />!II!! it . <br />ISM L t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.