Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 05 21

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes March 19, 2012 Page 11of 12 Council also discussed the demolition process regulatory modifications. They were interested in moving forward with the language presented with some minor modifications to what waspresented. Some on Council wereconcerned with having a moving target for the 50 years or older requirement. They thought it might be best to establish a specific time period, such as buildings built before WWII, rather than having the 50 years continually progress forward. Koertje – I am not sure whether their concern of the roving 50 years is regarding the demolition process rather the landmarking of buildings. La Grave – the hardship extension bothers me because there did not seem to be any discussion regarding the criteria involving a hardship. McCartney – staff could draft something that might be used to review a potential hardship. We can bring it back for you to review before we send to Council. Koertje – it seemed like they wanted to see more historical preservation maps on the website as well. They also wanted the community to participate in the surveys we are doing. May 11 Training in Pueblo McCartney presented the item to inform the HPC of this training session to see if anyone was interested in attending. There was a brief discussion regarding this training session. Survey – Reconnaissance Survey McCartney presented this item explaining an RFP is the next step for moving forward. It was recommended staff work with an HPC volunteer to create an RFP. This process will more than likely involve some citizen assistance. H.S.A Austin Niehoff McCartney presented this item and gave an update. Humphries Poli was chosen to do this project and we are awaiting the State to finalize the Grant approval. Stewart – how long will the process take once it begins. McCartney – 5 months. Bylaws McCartney suggested this item should be continued to next month. The HPC agreed.