Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 5, 2000 <br />Page 14. <br /> <br />antennae would bring and noted that it would serve 1,200 customers. He stated that it is <br />essential to provide serve for commerce and for the health and safety of phone customers. <br /> <br />Rowe stated that if the request is not approved, it prohibits Qwest from providing <br />wireless services to its customers. Rowe reviewed the definition of an ATS and stated <br />that the proposed structure is compatible to the surrounding locations and camouflages <br />the antenna. He stated that no other structure would be compatible with the surrounding <br />area, that the facility meets the setback, and height limit, and the design is appropriate for <br />an Industrial Zone. He noted that it does not look any different than any other utility <br />pole, 18" in diameter, 60' high, and the antenna is located in a canister. He stated that this <br />tower structure is a pole and the ordinance does not prohibit a pole. <br /> <br />Rowe argued that when City Council adopted the ordinance, it said that if the ATS meets <br />the definition it would be approved. Rowe reviewed the definition of an ATS and that it <br />must be compatible with the natural setting and surrounding structures. He stated that the <br />tower would fit within the Public Service substation and be compatible with the <br />industrially zoned area. He noted that the pole could be painted any color to blend in with <br />the natural setting and minimize the adverse visual impact. <br /> <br />Rowe summarized the proposal is congruent with the standards and guidelines of all <br />CMRS facility sites. He noted the tower structure and related equipment were designed <br />to be compatible with the surrounding substation buildings as well as all existing and <br />planned future uses in the area. He noted that the tower structure is designed to preserve <br />and enhance the existing character of the land, including the topography and the <br />vegetation. Rowe stated that Qwest believes in co-location and will make its facilities <br />available to other carriers. He stated that Qwest has submitted an affidavit stating that all <br />applicable FCC regulations regarding human health and exposure to radio frequency <br />conditions have been met. He stated that in Qwest's opinion, the tower structure <br />complies with the requirements of the PUD Ordinance and applicable design guidelines. <br />He noted that the tower will be 1000' into the STK property, therefore there will be a <br />minimal visual impact from four different directions. He stated the only issue is the <br />description of a monopole and therefore not grounds for denial. A denial would prohibit <br />Qwest from serving its customers. He referenced Section 332 of the Telecom Act and <br />Section 253A of the Telecom Act and stated that there are no health, safety or welfare <br />issues. Rowe stated that the recommendation of the Planning Commission was <br />inappropriate and asked Council to approve the Special Review Use permit. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />