My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 12 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 12 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 8:56:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/19/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 12 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 19, 2000 <br />Page 13. <br /> <br />Brown asked what the benefit is for Western Golf to indemnify the City and not hold the <br />liquor license. Simmons stated that it is Western Golf's corporate policy to not hold <br />liquor licenses in their name. <br /> <br />Howard asked if Western Golf will not hold the liquor license because they can only hold <br />one license in the State of Colorado. <br /> <br />Simmons stated that they will not hold a liquor license because it is their corporate <br />policy. Simmons reported that Staff will continue negotiations and will alert Council as <br />soon as some agreement reached. <br /> <br />Levihn asked for clarification on the management of the Lafayette golf course and if the <br />City actually holds the liquor license. Simmons stated that the City of Lafayette approves <br />the liquor license and holds the license for the golf course in its name. <br /> <br />Levihn stated that he shared Councilman Keany's concern about a lapse in the liquor <br />license and the potential harm it would cause the golf course. <br /> <br />Keany explained that the Golf Course Enterprise would hold the license instead of the <br />City. <br /> <br />Howard stated that he would like to see an arrangement where the liquor license holder <br />was not a party to the City. <br /> <br />Sisk voiced his concern with the City holding the liquor license at the golf course. He <br />suggested that Staff be directed to negotiate a sixty-day extension on the liquor license <br />where the City is not the holder of the license. <br /> <br />MOTION: Sisk moved that Staff be directed to negotiate a letter of intent with Western <br />Golf and to provide a third party, not the City of Louisville or any related party, to hold <br />the liquor license, seconded by Howard. <br /> <br />Mayer questioned whether it is really necessary for Council to have a motion on the <br />issue. <br /> <br />Sisk withdrew the motion. Howard agreed with the withdrawal of the motion. <br /> <br />Simmons reported on the Northwest Parkway Agreement regarding the relocation of the <br />right-of-way, and the construction of Highway 42 and 96th Connection. He noted there <br />will be additional funds from Boulder County Open Space. Simmons stated that more <br />information will be before the City Council at the next meeting. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.