My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 12 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 12 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:46 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 8:56:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/19/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 12 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 19, 2000 <br />Page 7. <br /> <br />property/building is eligible. The Applicant is willing to repeal the two wall signs <br />previously approved on the north and east sides of the building. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed that the sign is proposed to be constructed of opaque green, back lit, <br />reverse pan channel letters. The maximum letter height is proposed at 14 inches for the <br />capital letters. The logo is 2.5 feet in height, slightly larger than the 2-foot logo <br />previously approved. Total sign area is 42 square feet, resulting in a total sign area of <br />142 SF, less than the 221 SF the building is eligible for, but more than the previously <br />approved total of 122 SF. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed the Planning Commission Staff Report interpretation, which involved <br />determining whether the proposed sign location was an eligible "building frontage" as <br />defined in the City's zoning code. Wood stated that technically there is no "public <br />building entrance" or "main window display." The Planning Commission found that the <br />importance of the drive through as a public entrance to.a bank facility, combined with the <br />visibility of the proposed sign from both Centennial parkway and the private spine road <br />providing access to the property, make this an appropriate sign location. <br /> <br />Wood noted that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application on <br />December 12, 2000 and unanimously recommended approval of the request with six <br />conditions. There was Commission discussion relative to the logo height, and Staff was <br />directed to further research how other jurisdictions regulate logo size. Ordinance No. <br />1353 was tabled to allow that research to occur. In addition to the six conditions, three <br />minor tracking items were addressed. There were as follows: <br /> <br />1. That it shall be noted on the plans that the letters shall project not more than eight <br /> inches from the face of the wall. <br />2. That it shall be noted on the plans that with this approval, the previous final PUD <br /> approval for the Bank of Boulder, as it pertains to exterior signs, is hereby repealed <br /> and revoked; and <br />3. That upon final approval by City Council, if granted, the Applicant shall submit a <br /> more formal Amended Final PUD plan set, including appropriate signature blocks, <br /> title block, etc., subject to staff review and approval prior to recording. <br /> <br />Sisk called for Applicant presentation. <br /> <br />Mike Doody, 7500 W. 84th Way, Arvada, CO, representing First National Bank of <br />Colorado, stated that the Bank and Gordon Sign Company believe that the entrance off <br />Centennial Parkway, the drive-through, is the main vehicle traffic entrance and should be <br />identified. He stated he was available to answer any Council questions. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.