My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2012 02 28 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2012 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2012 02 28 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:05:43 PM
Creation date
6/5/2012 9:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6D1 or 6C6 ?
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2012 02 28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Overall City appearance /attractiveness 1 2 3 4 5 <br />Passive /active recreation amenities (e.g., trails, recreation center, parks) 1 2 3 4 5 <br />Personal contact with City staff 1 2 3 4 5 <br />Safety /low crime 1 2 3 4 5 <br />Support for businesses (a business friendly climate) 1 2 3 4 5 <br />Transportation system (streets, highways, bus system, trails) 1 2 3 4 5 <br />21. When retaiUbusiness areas age or become vacant, there are many possible responses. To what extent do you support <br />or oppose each of the following approaches for old or empty retail/business areas in Louisville? <br />Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly Don't <br />oppose oppose know <br />support support <br />Allow zoning or use changes (residential, office, other retail/business <br />uses) to attract redevelopment 1 <br />For some sites, allow modifications to existing height and/or density <br />requirements to attract redevelopment 1 <br />Keep existing zoning and uses, even if that means the site is left vacant 1 <br />2 <br />3 4 5 <br />2 3 4 5 <br />2 3 <br />4 5 <br />22. To what extent do you support or oppose extending the current library tax to pay for some of the library's operations? <br />❑ Strongly support ❑ Somewhat support ❑ Strongly support ❑ Somewhat support <br />23. In 2002, Louisville voters extended the 0.375% sales and use tax for open space and parks acquisition, development, <br />maintenance and related purposes. The tax is set to expire on December 31, 2013. To what extent do you support or <br />oppose each of the following possible options for the open space and parks tax? <br />Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly Don't <br />support support oppose oppose know <br />Extending the current tax for an additional 10 years 1 2 3 4 5 <br />Extending the current tax indefinitely (no expiration) 1 2 3 4 5 <br />24. The two RTD FasTracks transit options <br />possible for the Northwest Corridor <br />(service from Denver to Longmont, <br />including Westminster, Louisville, <br />Boulder, etc.) are Commuter Rail (CR) <br />and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Only one <br />will ultimately happen. To what extent do <br />you support or oppose each of the transit <br />options? <br />Commuter Rail (CR) <br />- Original FasTracks plan <br />- Capacity of 200 passengers per trip <br />- Service average every 20 minutes <br />during peak hours <br />- Included in current land use <br />plans /does not require additional <br />roadways or environmental studies <br />- Service would start in 2024 <br />Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) <br />-Newer alternative <br />- Capacity of 45 passengers per trip <br />- Service average every 7 -10 minutes <br />during peak hours <br />-Would need to update land use plans/ <br />could require additional roadways and <br />will require an environmental study <br />- Service would start in 2020 <br />Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose <br />Commuter Rail (CR) 1 2 3 4 <br />Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 1 2 3 4 <br />25. RTD is proposing a 4/10 of a percent sales tax increase (4 cents on every $10 purchase) to complete FasTracks, <br />regardless of whether CR or BRT is chosen. Knowing that only one option will be chosen, to what extent do you <br />support or oppose the RTD tax to complete FasTracks with either of the following? <br />Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose <br />Commuter Rail (CR) 1 2 3 4 <br />Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 1 2 3 4 <br />26. While the 4/10 of a percenttax increase applies to both options, once the transit option is complete, CR will cost a <br />total of $1.7 billion (in 2024) and BRT (in 2020) will cost a total of $894 million. Does knowing the total cost for <br />completion of each project increase your support, leave it the same or decrease it? <br />More supportive Same level of support Less supportive <br />Commuter Rail (CR) 1 2 3 <br />Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 1 2 3 <br />Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are completely <br />anonymous and will be reported in group form only. 7 <br />2012 Louisville Citizen Survey <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.