My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2012 03 13
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2012 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2012 03 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:48:38 AM
Creation date
6/8/2012 1:44:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2012 03 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Street edge safety <br />The LRC and property owners agree that creating a pedestrian and cycling friendly environment <br />along the corridor is an opportunity within this project. There is, however, concern about the <br />differing elevations and proximity of drainage swales. <br />Sidewalks and pedestrian access <br />The majority of agencies agree that as development and transit use increases, safe pedestrian <br />access needs to be provided in the study area, as it is currently not provided. The City of <br />Louisville and the property owners pointed out two weaknesses: first, many properties have <br />differing elevations and the lack of crossings north of South Boulder Road. <br />Underpasses <br />Underpass discussion focused on two areas within the study area: the railroad underpass and <br />the potential of an underpass under Highway 42:,The City of Louisville, theCity of Lafayette and <br />the property owners all agree that infrastructure and underpass'placement needs to be <br />addressed. The property owners further 'stated that an: underpass is a key catalyst to <br />development in the project area. <br />Trail connections <br />Trail connections, and increased. regional trailaccess was a topic of discussion in all of the <br />SWOT workshops. The opportunity to integratea tail and safe trail crossings within the project <br />area is a desire. <br />The generalconsensus is that °the uncertainty with FasTracks poses a threat to the project <br />process. In that; agencies were open to °the idea to move forward with a phased approach that <br />accounts for the eventual transit station in Louisville. <br />Cycling <br />The cycling conversation was closely related to trail connections. The City of Louisville pointed <br />out that there are two types of cyclists that this project should accommodate, recreation and <br />experienced cyclists. <br />Physical constraints and right -of -way <br />Agencies recognize that the corridor is constrained by right -of -way and established land uses, <br />specifically the open space to the east and historic Miner's field to the west. <br />5 <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.