My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2012 03 13
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2012 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2012 03 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:48:38 AM
Creation date
6/8/2012 1:44:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2012 03 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Category <br />Classification • <br />- ` City of Louisville - <br />LRC <br />— Boulder County <br />City of tafayette <br />Property Owners <br />CDOT " ' <br />RT6 <br />Threat <br />No access plan with CDOT <br />Access ignored on the east side <br />of Highway 42 <br />Street edge <br />safety <br />Strength <br />Providing safe crossing of SH 42 <br />Weakness <br />' <br />Highway profile should not <br />be altered <br />Currently unsafe corridor <br />Guardrail on west side of Highway <br />north of South Boulder Road <br />keeps bikers very close to traffic <br />Opportunity <br />Creating a walkable environment <br />the whole length of the west side <br />Threat <br />,. <br />Sidewalks <br />Strength <br />- <br />Weakness <br />Properties at <br />elevation with differing <br />" <br />No crossing north of South <br />Boulder Road (east/west trail <br />connection) <br />Opportunity <br />' Creating a walkable environment <br />the whole length of the west side <br />' Threat <br />Pedestrian <br />access <br />Strength <br />Increases in pedestrian <br />access in all directions along <br />and across Highway 42 <br />Providing safe crossing of SH 42; <br />",May enhance access to local - <br />- historic site for local residents. ; <br />Weakness <br />ADA design challenges <br />Peoples current orientation is <br />north/South not eastlwest <br />The pedestrian challenge is <br />to get people from the east <br />side of 42 to the west side of <br />the Highway <br />- <br />Mixing pedestrians with the <br />Highway <br />Pedestrian connection on Pine <br />Street to downtown; RTD plan <br />shows an at -grade pedestrian <br />crossing <br />Opportuni ty <br />Opportunity to tie the east <br />side of the tracks and ball <br />fields to the rest of the _ . <br />community; Pedestrian ., <br />access along Highway 42 is - <br />• <br />Manage desire lines for'future <br />pedestrian access to the <br />- <br />Potential for a pedestrian <br />underpass for 42 <br />Opportunity to provide safe <br />connection across 42 for <br />pedestrians <br />downtown rail stabon from the <br />° :' east side of SH 42 <br />needed <br />Threat <br />Some people may perceive <br />that the City is putting too <br />much priority on pedestrians <br />in a Highway Corridor <br />At -grade pedestrian crossing of 42 <br />Underpass <br />Strength <br />Emergency vehicle access <br />is not needed for the <br />pedestrian underpass; <br />exists at Griffith <br />Street over the railroad <br />tracks ' <br />_ <br />Key infrastructure and catalyst to <br />east <br />ast side development is <br />underpass/ gateway <br />10 <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.