My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2012 03 13
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2012 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2012 03 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:48:38 AM
Creation date
6/8/2012 1:44:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2012 03 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Category <br />Classification <br />City of Louisville <br />LRC <br />boulder County ` <br />City of Lafayette <br />Property Owne''rs _ <br />CDOT' <br />RTD ", ",' <br />Weakness <br />It is critical to keep pipes in <br />the same location under the <br />RR to avoid a long process <br />with BNSF <br />Infrastructure needs to be <br />addressed <br />Opportunity <br />Potential for pedestrian grade <br />separated crossing of SH 42 <br />Creating a gateway, not just an <br />underpass <br />Phased pedestrian connections <br />(signal then underpass) <br />Threat <br />No vehicle access at the <br />under pass; limit future; <br />Narrow crossing may be <br />underwhelming; cost- <br />effective, but not considering <br />the 50 year vision <br />• ,, <br />,.:Underpass Flooding <br />- <br />•• <br />Funding will drive the underpass <br />design <br />Trail Connections <br />Strength <br />Ability to provide access to <br />trail network <br />Could Improve safe access to' <br />open space property for visitor , <br />use, agricultural operations, and <br />management <br />Trail connection from Indian <br />Peaks to rail; trail connections <br />to station <br />, <br />An asymmetrical profile is okay <br />to accommodate a bike <br />lane /shoulder <br />' <br />Weakness <br />No true north /south trail <br />connection <br />- <br />A general concern is the <br />overdevelopment of new trails, <br />i.e. minimal use, at the expense <br />of agricultural lands. <br />•� ?,, <br />No crossing north of South <br />Boulder Road (east/west trail <br />connection) <br />Opportunity <br />Creation of new trails <br />connections to reservoir and <br />open space <br />Integration of a trail (from Short <br />- .Street vicinity }through the open. <br />space and future soccer area` , <br />, ' <br />' . Incorporating a <br />maintenance/access road as a <br />trail along the proposed Urban <br />Drainage project; required 8 <br />' foot access road to facilities <br />Opportunity to incorporate bike <br />lanes <br />Threat <br />Transit <br />Strength <br />Having a conveniently located <br />train.as a more sustainable <br />alternative to automobile travel <br />Weakness <br />Reality of future rail <br />Opportunity <br />The potential connection of -' <br />the commuter rail station and" <br />bus station to downtown <br />.-. '" <br />`Could include regional transit <br />improvements <br />Threat <br />The introduction of buses cart <br />slow traffic , <br />Development vision relies on rail <br />implementation whose timeline <br />and cost is uncertain and <br />increasing <br />Uncertainty with FasTracks; RTD <br />fence design and its compatibility <br />with the noise wall <br />Reality of future rail <br />Cycling <br />Strength <br />Regional bike route and <br />accommodating experienced <br />' and recreational cyclists <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.