My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2012 05 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2012 05 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:25 PM
Creation date
7/16/2012 1:32:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2012 05 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 21, 2012 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />Peter Stewart Abstain <br />Steve Poppitz Yes <br />Motion denied: 2 to 2 <br />Koertje made a second motion to release the stay. <br />Fasick seconded. <br />Name Vote <br />Mike Koertje Yes <br />Heather Lewis Absent <br />Jessica Fasick Yes <br />Florian Speier Abstain <br />Aquiles La Grave No <br />Peter Stewart Abstain <br />Steve Poppitz No <br />Motion denied: 2 to 2 <br />Koertje stated the request to release the stay is approved by inability to approve stay. <br /> <br />Stewart and Speier came back in to join the meeting. <br />Public Hearing – 1131 Jefferson Avenue – Grant Request <br />Robinson presented the information in the packet. Council remanded this item to <br />request a finding of “extraordinary circumstances” and to receive a stamped engineers <br />letter. <br />Koertje inquired why is this back before the HPC. <br />McCartney stated the City Council wanted more information regarding the extraordinary <br />circumstances and the reasoning behind the cost reduction. The work also has to be <br />signed off by a structural engineer. <br />There was discussion as to what the extraordinary circumstances were and why the <br />renovation was reduced in cost. It was also discussed that the work has been reviewed <br />and approved by a structural engineer. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.