Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />March 20, 2001 <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />Laura Page, 920 Rex Street, Louisville, CO stated that she favored Alternative F, because <br />it moves the road away from the City and preserves the open space and wildlife. She <br />stated that Alternative B would remove all the cottonwood trees. <br /> <br />Matt Jones, 265 Dahlia Drive, Louisville, CO, stated that the Louisville Citizen Open <br />Space Advisory Board met last evening and offers, through resolution, the following <br />recommendations. 1) Use the current 76th Street alignment (Option E) across Coal Creek <br />and 2) thoroughly investigate alternative funding sources to augment project costs before <br />project implementation. Further, the Louisville Open Space Advisory Board recommends <br />that if the investigation determines that using the current road alignment (Option E) is not <br />feasible, that project managers: 1) Actively ensure that land disturbance to the project <br />area be minimized. 2) Minimize the use of fill and minimize the use of a pillar type <br />construction to minimize the long-term impacts to wildlife habitat and movements. 3) <br />Actively restore the riparian and associated areas using native grasses, shrubs and trees, <br />which would be found in the area. <br /> <br />Pe~ Henneke, 401 County Road, Louisville, CO, commented that she favored closing <br />96 Street. She stated that she has lived at that address for over ten years and noticed an <br />incredible amount of the traffic passing by her house. She said that County Road gets <br />very busy and asked that Council consider closing 96th Street. <br /> <br />Linda Newbold, 9750 Empire Road, Unincorporated Boulder County, stated that <br />Alternative F would impact their home. She stated whichever alternative is chosen, it <br />would still impact their property. She noted that they have concerns with the entrance of <br />the highway and other CDOT issues. She concurred with the statements on preserving <br />the open space. She stated that a vast majority of use of the open space is the trails. She <br />agreed there would be an impact on the wetland and the wildlife. She stated that all three <br />of the homes would be unlivable and that Alternative F would cause families to move. <br />She voiced her opinion that B is the best alternative for maintaining the bike path area. <br /> <br />Doug Grinbergs, 530 W. Sycamore Circle, Louisville, CO, stated that he attended the <br />Open Space Advisory Board meeting and shares their concerns. He expressed his <br />appreciation of the Open Space Advisory Board and asked that the Council cOnsider their <br />recommendations. He referenced the Louisville Fishing Pond project and disturbance of <br />the open space and animal habitats. He asked Council to consider the environmental <br />impact of their decisions. <br /> <br />Pamela Vagnieers, 430 and 444 County Road, Louisville, CO, stated that they support the <br />Highway 42/96th Street Connection. <br /> <br />There were no further public comments. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Phare stated that it becomes cost prohibitive to proceed with all <br />the current alternatives to the next level of planning. He stated that there are timelines <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />