Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Erica Markham, Broomfield resident — Ms. Markham identified herself as a "mudder" <br />who enjoys using the trails in a variety of conditions, °but indicated that she would avoid <br />using the trails if signs were posted. <br />Mark Vellecat — Mr. Vellecat said he was in favor of a perimeter trail and asked if the <br />LOSCAB and City Staff had looked at methods other than trail closure to control <br />cheatgrass. Ms. Lair noted that a potential path closure of the northern trail was not <br />primarily about weed control. <br />Marybeth Vellecat Ms. Vellecat noted that while she was not an ecologist, she is a <br />scientist, and asked if the LOSCAB and City Staff had considered other environmental <br />consequences of trail closures. <br />Jim Schutz — Mr. Schutz spoke on behalf of maintaining a balance of preservation and <br />access and noted that he believed Mesa trail users did .a good job of "self- policing." <br />Ellen Lutz — Ms. Lutz identified herself as a real estate agent and noted that the Mesa is a <br />big selling point for both residents and newcomers to Louisville. She warned that closing <br />access to the Mesa may have a negative impact on property values in the City. <br />Comments from the board: <br />Bob Muckle — Mr. Muckle summarized much of the LOSCAB's discussion and debate <br />regarding various classification issues and the rationale behind the trail reconfigurations <br />being considered. Mr. Muckle reviewed the ESCO inventory findings regarding the <br />importance of the northwest section of the Mesa and noted that he had often observed <br />users "off trail" and dogs "off leash." Mr. Muckle noted that he is in favor of a perimeter <br />trail, but favors closing off the north trail running through the preserve section. <br />Pat Hornbostel — Mr. Hornbostel reviewed on the Mesa map a number of alternatives <br />which had been considered and pointed out the specific areas the LOSCAB was seeking <br />to protect. He also noted that as a wheelchair user, he was inclined to see the perimeter <br />trail built as a crusher fine and not simply left as an undeveloped, but authorized social <br />trail. He did comment that many of the undesignated social trail were so entrenched, <br />wide and compacted that he was able to access them quite nicely even from his <br />wheelchair. Mr. Hornbostel also noted that he had experienced many dogs off leash <br />throughout the Mesa and, from his . vantage point in a wheelchair, found that "all dogs are <br />big dogs." Mr. Hornbostel is in favor of a perimeter trail, but favors closing off the north <br />trail running through the preserve section. <br />Cary Tengler — Mr. Tengler expressed his concern that there was significant amount of <br />misunderstanding and misinformation re: potential trail reconfigurations. He noted that <br />the LOSCAB and City Staff discussions had never been about closing access on the <br />Mesa, but rather at expanding the trail system and redirecting it to protect ecologically <br />important sections. Mr. Tengler also noted the detrimental effects of social trails on <br />wildlife buffers and then referenced the City of Louisville Open Space Survey conducted <br />