Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> November 20, 2012 <br /> Page 7 of 15 <br /> Council member Jasiak asked if the application was denied, could the applicant <br /> resubmit his application. City Attorney Light confirmed the applicant could re-file his <br /> application, but noted the application cannot be denied yet provide conditions that <br /> guarantee future approval. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Mr. Poppitz asked if he would be reimbursed. He wanted to reroof, reside and install <br /> custom windows and totally restore the exterior. He would not request HPC funds for <br /> the home's interior. <br /> Michael Menaker, 1827 Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO concurred with staff's <br /> recommendation. He did not feel the home had the architecture integrity. He agreed the <br /> social history is more important than the structure. He urged support for staff's <br /> recommendation. <br /> Council member Keany inquired about the retroactive repayment. Planning Director <br /> Russ stated the code does not allow for reimbursement for a structure improvement <br /> prior to landmarking. <br /> Council member Loo voiced her appreciation of the people who came forward in <br /> support of landmarking this home. She noted the City will make significant financial <br /> contributions to the Grain Elevator and suggested a higher standard for HPC funds. <br /> MOTION: Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 76, Series 2012, seconded <br /> by Council member Yarnell. <br /> Council member Keany asked if there is an ability to make retroactive payments. <br /> Planning Director Russ agreed the applicant may reapply, but the Louisville Municipal <br /> Code does not allow for funds to be saved or set aside for a home which could be <br /> landmarked in the future or reimburse a home that is not currently designated as a <br /> landmark. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated it was not a matter of money, but about landmarking <br /> worthy properties. Council member Yarnell agreed it was not about money, but felt this <br /> is significant because of the neighborhood piece. <br /> Council member Jasiak asked Mr. Stewart whether there are better examples of other <br /> miner homes. Mr. Stewart confirmed there are better examples of the miners' homes. <br /> VOTE ON THE MOTION: The vote was 3 —3. Council members Yarnell, Jasiak and <br /> Mayor Muckle voted yes. Mayor Pro Tem Dalton, Council members Loo and Keany <br /> voted no. Absent: Council member Sackett. A tie vote results in denial of the motion to <br /> approve Resolution No. 76, Series 2012. <br />