My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2012 10 09 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2012 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2012 10 09 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:05:44 PM
Creation date
12/10/2012 2:17:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6D2 or 6C6 ?
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2012 10 09 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bond Funding <br />As a result of changes in Federal water quality regulations, staff anticipates having to make <br />significant improvements to the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant. We also anticipate it may be <br />necessary to expand the City's South Water Treatment Plant. The specific needs and funding <br />requirements for these projects will be more clearly refined in 2013. However, staff anticipates <br />that they will require significant funding (we have included nearly $17 million in the CIP). <br />Because interest rates are at historic lows, because there are not currently sufficient reserves to <br />fund these projects entirely on a cash basis, and because the benefit of these projects will be <br />felt over many years, staff intends to explore further funding these and perhaps other projects <br />with bonds. Another factor to consider with interest rates so low is that the overall cost of <br />construction may increase more rapidly than the cost of borrowing. In that case, it may make <br />sense to use bond funding to complete some projects now rather than wait until we have built <br />up enough reserves to fund those projects on a cash basis. If we wait, we might see the cost of <br />the project at a later date exceed the cost, including financing costs, of doing the project now. <br />Staff will explore that issue and the pros and cons of both approaches and review the results <br />with the City Council. <br />Compensation, Benefits and Training <br />Reflecting our guiding principle that "Talented, motivated, well- trained employees are the City's <br />most important asset ", we keep our compensation and benefits package competitive —to retain <br />good employees and be able to effectively recruit new employees when that is necessary —by <br />annually comparing our pay and benefits with other similar employers in our market area and by <br />making adjustments based on that data. The following actions reflect this approach and the <br />2013 proposed budget includes funding to implement these actions: <br />• Merit Increases. We must maintain our commitment to enable high performing employees <br />to move through their pay range over time. To do this, staff recommends that we provide <br />merit increases for performance that is documented as "Outstanding" (4.0 %) or "Exceeds <br />Expectations" (2.0 %) and "Meets Expectations" (1.0 %). We anticipate that the distribution of <br />these merit increase will result in a 3% average annual increase in wages. Also, in order to <br />maintain the City's commitment to Police Officers and the established pay range and steps, <br />Officers whose performance demonstrates merit would receive a 5% increase. Many <br />employees — including over half of all Police Officers and Sergeants —have reached the top <br />of their pay range and have not received any pay increase or bonus for several years. To <br />reward such employees for their continuing exemplary service, we will pay a one -time bonus <br />of $250 to $1,000, depending on their performance evaluation. <br />• Health Insurance Coverage and Other Benefits. As you will recall, in 2009 we reduced <br />employee benefits in several ways, including increasing the percentage of premium that <br />employees must pay for health insurance to make the cost sharing comparable with similar <br />jurisdictions. In 2010 and 2011, we maintained the existing benefits package and did not <br />shift any additional costs to employees. In 2012, due to a significant increase in the Kaiser <br />premiums, we implemented a modest reduction in plan benefits and an increase in <br />employee premiums of between 7% and 14% for the HMO Plan. We also increased the <br />deductibles for the High Deductable Health Plan (HDHP) to $5,000 per year. We also <br />adjusted the premiums and contributions for HMO and HDHP plans so the City's cost per <br />employee would be the same for both plans, regardless of which plan the employee <br />chooses. <br />Our compensation review this year indicates the City's health benefits package is <br />competitive with other jurisdictions so we intend to keep the percentage of premium that <br />employees must pay for HMO coverage at 15% (employee only), 20% (employee and <br />spouse or children) and 25% (full family coverage). Because the HDHP coverage is less <br />expensive, the City offers this plan at no cost to the employee and, as an additional <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.