Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />March 8, 2005 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />proposal to hire a lobbyist to assist both entities to obtain funding for transit <br />options. <br /> <br />Councilmember Don Brown stated his reluctance to partner with Boulder County <br />when there is a Commissioner actively lobbying against the City of Louisville's <br />Comprehensive Plan update, which includes transit-oriented development. He <br />cautioned Council against pursuing funds for transit-oriented development without <br />the support of the residents. He suggested contacting a developer to provide the <br />City with ideas on what developers are looking for before investing in a community. <br />He explained that until the City understands how to attract developers to Louisville, <br />he was uncertain that the updated Comprehensive Plan will succeed. <br /> <br />Council agreed that the City is losing sales tax dollars to surrounding communities. <br />There was discussion on how to inform the residents that slow growth is necessary <br />to maintain a viable community. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sheri Marsella stated that at the recent Affordable Housing <br />Summit, she was shocked to learn that surrounding communities experienced <br />growth rates of at least six percent over the past five years; however, the City of <br />Louisville's growth rate for the same period was .04%! <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk reported that the City has been participating in a draft Environmental <br />Impact Study (EIS) for transportation improvements along US 36. The Bus Rapid <br />Transit (BRT) lane is a critical component of the project. There is concern that if <br />there is a toll component to the BRT transportation project, it will not be eligible for <br />federal funding. <br /> <br />Heather Balser explained that there is the misunderstanding that voter approval of <br />FasTracks guaranteed the BRT and rail component. However, BRT and rail are <br />only guaranteed by a recommendation through the EIS process. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk and Heather Balser agreed that the next six months will be critical for <br />this project. <br /> <br />Update - DRCOG Issues - Councilmember Don Brown <br />Mayor Sisk commended Council member Brown for his participation with DRCOG <br />and the benefits the City has received from his involvement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brown explained that DRCOG representatives spend a significant <br />amount of time evaluating proposed legislation issues and determining whether or <br />not to support each issue. He provided a brief overview of some issues currently <br />under discussion, specifically the Urban Growth Boundaries. He reported that <br />DRCOG is currently discussing whether to establish criteria for submitting a <br />request to DRCOG to amend the Urban Growth Boundaries within communities. <br />