Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 5, 2012 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />$460,000. The City's model suggests the annual revenue from the development will <br />exceed annual expenditures by approximately $111,000. The model also suggests the <br />project will contribute $134,000 annually to historic preservation and open space. If the <br />project generates these revenues, it would take two years of operation to offset the <br />initial negative fiscal impact. <br />Special Review Use Assessment - Louisville Municipal Code § 17.40.100.A lists five <br />criteria to be considered by the Planning Commission in reviewing a Special Review <br />Use application. The Planning Commission is authorized to place conditions on its <br />recommendation of approval, if the Commission concludes they are necessary to <br />comply with all of the criteria. Review Use — Staff finds the criterion has been met. <br />Staff recommended City Council approve Resolution 77, Series 2012, a Special Review <br />Use (SRU) Permit and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) associated with <br />the redevelopment of the Safeway Site, at 707 East South Boulder Road with three <br />conditions: <br />1. The applicant provides the City an updated and signed shared parking and <br />access agreement for the shopping center with all affected parties at time of Final <br />PUD submittal; <br />2. The applicant creates prior to Final PUD submittal a shared parking management <br />program that will ensure the residential portion of the parking can achieve a 2- <br />spaces per unit ratio between the hours of 8:00 PM and 8:00 AM. <br />3. The applicant resolves shadowing concerns with existing surrounding structures <br />prior to Final PUD submittal. <br />The recommendation was based on staff's findings the project meets the criteria for <br />approving a special review use and preliminary development plan, and the Planning <br />Commission's resolution recommending approval of the project. The waivers requested <br />by the applicant are warranted by the design and amenities incorporated in the <br />development plan. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Loo inquired whether the Business Assistance Package (BAP) was a <br />part of the economic analysis. Staff confirmed the BAP was not part of the economic <br />analysis. She stated she was not aware of a BAP connected with a Special Review <br />Use request. City Attorney Light stated the Business Assistance Package was a stand- <br />alone package and is not legally attached to the land use matter. <br />Mayor Muckle requested the staff's presentation be included in the public record. <br />APPLICANT PRESENTATION <br />24 <br />