My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 12 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2012 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2012 12 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:16 PM
Creation date
1/18/2013 2:18:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2012 12 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October15, 2012 <br />Page 3of 7 <br />Robinson stated by ordinance there cannot be another public hearing and the permit <br />must be released. <br />Stewart asked staff to give the prepared presentation. <br />Robinson presented staff’s report. <br />Fran Raudenbush, owner, gave a presentation. Shestated this structure had been <br />previously reviewed by HPC and released. Unfortunately the permit had expired before <br />she could act on the demolition permit. <br />Stewart stated he was on the subcommittee and believed the building had a good form <br />and good architectural integrity. He reiterated about the preservation incentives <br />available for this property. He asked the owner about the shed on the side of the <br />house. <br />Raudenbush stated the shed will most likely be repurposed. <br />Stewart asked staff if the shed was non-conforming. <br />Robinsonstated it more than likely is. <br />Stewart stated if the shed remains in place it does not have to conform. <br />Lewis stated the owner might want to have a soil boring on the property. <br />Raudenbush stated she intends to. <br />Stewart reminded the applicant of the deadlines of the demolition permit and the <br />building permit. <br />Public Hearing –Demolition Request –520 Grant <br />Robinson stated due to lack of a quorum there cannot be a public hearing on this item. <br />Stewart stated he needed to recues himself from any discussion due to his involvement <br />on this project. <br />Koertje stated this shows how important it is to attend our meetings. <br />Robinson read from the Louisville Municipal Code regarding the 60 day public hearing <br />requirement for demolition permits. <br />Stewart asked staff to give an outline of the elements needed to get an application to a <br />public hearing, including the timeline for a social history, public notice, etc. <br />Discussion –Loans from the HPF <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.