Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 16, 2013 <br />Page 12 of 23 <br />lowered on South Boulder Road from 30 units to 25 and the minimum 15 units was <br />eliminated, giving more power to the small area plans. <br />Council member Keany stated some areas allow a density of 30 units per acre. <br />Planning Director Russ explained in the small area plans those densities can be <br />reviewed. He reviewed the range of units per acre per plan area. <br />Mayor Muckle stated once the Council reviews the small area plans notice will be a <br />main component. He suggested neighborhood distribution of flyers. He appreciated the <br />revisions made to the Comprehensive Plan and the inclusion of the Cottonwood <br />corridor. He asked where the 1,000 residential units would go and would it change the <br />Louisville Plaza. Planning Director Russ explained the assumptions would not change. <br />Steel Ranch, the North End and the Alkonis property represents 300 units east of the <br />railroad tracks. There are 100 units of redevelopment west of the railroad tracks. <br />MCCASLIN CORRIDOR: Council member Loo asked for clarification on the four -story <br />building heights. Planning Director Russ explained this is a retail district and the goal of <br />the plan is for retail to be dominant in the district. In a small area plan, the height <br />incentive is strategically placed for office or residential land uses to realize retail on the <br />ground floor. The Planning Division will do 3D modeling to determine whether the fourth <br />story is a negative from a community character perspective. <br />Council member Loo was not in favor of four -story structures along the McCaslin <br />Corridor, but agreed to have the comment in the Comp Plan for discussion purposes. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton supported the revisions made to the McCaslin Corridor. <br />Mayor Muckle supported the changes made to the McCaslin Corridor to eliminate <br />residential, restricting the street types and allowing the small area plan to provide the <br />details. In the urban center, south of Cherry he preferred the same no mixed use <br />streets statement west of McCaslin. He was not opposed to mixed use office <br />development. Planning Director Russ stated generally once the street types are <br />established land uses will follow. A mixed -use street type would allow residential. By <br />restricting the mixed -use street type west of McCaslin, the Comprehensive Plan would <br />restrict residential land uses west of McCaslin. <br />Council member Keany felt a mixed use development next to the Bus Rapid Transit <br />(BRT) would limit the success of BRT in the future. <br />Council member Sackett thanked Planning Director Russ for his explanation of the Plan <br />revisions. His concern centered on the number of living units. He wanted assurance <br />the developments would be first class and be a quality development. Planning Director <br />Russ explained the Comprehensive Plan is the most powerful planning tool the City <br />has. Character based language was added to the Comprehensive Plan to protect the <br />character of the City and once the Comprehensive Plan is approved, rules can be <br />