My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2013 05 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2013 05 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:11 PM
Creation date
5/29/2013 9:25:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2013 05 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The proposed design includes introducing boulders on the east side of the property to <br />provide retention and even out the steep grade. The height of the boulders is <br />approximately 18 inches above grade on the front (north) side of the property and less <br />than a foot towards the rear (south) end of the property. The fence would then be located <br />on top of the boulders. The six foot tall portion of the fence is approximately 25 feet long. <br />The fence then drops to four feet tall for 20 feet until it connects to a six foot tall fence on <br />the rear of the property. The six foot fence on the rear (south end) of the property is <br />permitted by the PUD, and does not require a variance. <br /> <br /> <br />e <br />8.110 <br />es findings that all of the criteria, <br />s established under Section 17.48.110.B.1-6, have been satisfied, insofar as applicable: <br /> <br />The applicant has provided a written analysis of the variance criteria, which has been <br />included in the BOA packet materials. Following is a staff review and analysis of the <br />variance criteria. <br /> <br />1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as irregularity, <br />narrowness or shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or other physical <br />conditions peculiar to the affected property. <br /> physical circumstances on this property. The first circumstance is <br />etween the finish floor level of the house, and the east sidewalk. <br /> <br />pography of the side yard and the adjacency to planned commercial development is <br />usual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located. <br />es located adjacent to planned future <br />commercial development, the applicant’s property is the only one with a significant grade <br /> <br />REVIEW CRITERIA: <br /> <br />The BOA has authority to hear and decide, grant or deny this application for a varianc <br />from Section 17.16.120 B of the LMC by the powers granted the BOA in Section 17.4 <br />of the LMC. The BOA may grant a variance only if it mak <br />a <br /> <br />There are two unique <br />he grade difference bt <br />The eastern side yard of the property is very steep, with a 30% slope on the north end of <br />the house. The other unique aspect of this lot is its proximity to commercially zoned <br />property across the street. There are only three homes in the entire Takoda Subdivision <br />which are located adjacent to properties planned for commercial development. The unique <br />to <br />peculiar to the affected property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />2. That the un <br /> <br />There are 350 dwelling units in the Takoda Subdivision, and only three of them are located <br />adjacent to planned future commercial development. This unique condition does not exist <br />hroughout the neighborhood. Of the three propertit <br /> <br /> 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.