My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 04 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2013 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 04 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:04 PM
Creation date
6/14/2013 11:04:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6D4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2013 04 02
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Cityot CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br /> Louisville AGENDA ITEM 5B <br /> COLORADO SINCE 1878 <br /> SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH RED OAK CONSULTING <br /> (ARCADIS U.S., INC.) FOR UTILITY RATE STUDY <br /> DATE: APRIL 2, 2013 <br /> PRESENTED BY: KURT KOWAR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR <br /> SUMMARY: <br /> The Public Works Department solicited and received seven proposals for the Utility <br /> Rate Study, which are summarized in the table below. After initial proposal review, <br /> three companies were eliminated based on experience, insufficient amount of hours <br /> dedicated to the project, or not following requirements of the Request for Proposals. <br /> Four companies were selected to advance to the interview process for final selection. <br /> BIDDER PROPOSAL PRICE INTERVIEW DATE <br /> Red Oak Consulting $115,440 March 18, 2013 <br /> Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. $88,815 March 18, 2013 <br /> NewGen Strategies & Solutions $87,690 Not Considered Further <br /> Merrick& Company $78,000 March 19, 2013 <br /> MWH $74,890 March 18, 2013 II <br /> RG and Associates, LLC $34,882 Not Considered Further <br /> Frachetti Engineering, Inc. $33,095 Not Considered Further <br /> The interview panel consisting of Kurt Kowar, Director of Public Works; Kevin Watson, <br /> Director of Finance; and Dmitry Tepo, Water Resources Engineer; has selected MWH <br /> and Red Oak Consulting as finalists. Although Red Oak's proposal is significantly more <br /> expensive, it also is more comprehensive. The price discrepancy was discussed with <br /> Red Oak and their project team believes the level of effort estimated is vital for a <br /> successful project. In summary, the Committee recommends Red Oak's proposal for <br /> the following reasons: <br /> • Team presence, experience, and the depth of knowledge. <br /> • Effective track record with Boulder County communities, including City and <br /> County of Broomfield, City of Boulder and Town of Superior. <br /> • Additional staff dedicated to Utility Task Force meetings. <br /> • Items in scope beyond those found in a typical rate study, such as water bill <br /> frequency analysis by customer class, reclaimed water cost evaluation, analysis <br /> of miscellaneous fees charged by each utility, and others. <br /> • Financial studies are the company's sole business. <br /> CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.