Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 20, 2013 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br />Watson believed this was going to need to be a local effort. He added he would only <br />consider the house under the stay, not the other structures on the property. <br />Koertje stated this would be a great candidate to be placed on the City’s website. <br />Robinson stated he could check into it. <br />Koertje stated he is not interested in removing the stay at this point since there are so <br />many other options. <br />La Grave stated Craig’s List and the City website are not as efficient as an ad in a <br />newspaper. He added there is money in the HPC public outreach budget and he has <br />the background to market this structure. <br />Fasick stated she does not want to drag the stay out any further. Moving the structure <br />will not save the neighborhood. <br />Koertje agreed but stated saving the structure would be a good alternative. <br />Discussion ensued regarding an ad in the newspaper. <br />Frank stated he did not want his property advertised and make a big public statement <br />about the demolition of this historic structure, as has happened with other structures. <br />La Grave stated he could work with Frank to alleviate concerns. <br />Frank stated his offer to move the property was for locals only. He would not want it <br />advertised. <br />Watson stated he understood. <br />La Grave said the first step is to find someone to take the structure. <br />Frank stated he understood the City might be interested in taking it. <br />Watson explained the City does not have the space to control additional resources. <br />Watson stated it appeared the stay would remain. <br />Frank stated he is not interested in placing this structure in ads. <br />Discussion ensued about lifting the stay and whether it could be done at tonight’s <br />meeting. <br />It was determined a motion could be made but it appears motion to lift the stay would <br />not be supported tonight.