My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2013 06 11
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2013 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2013 06 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:50:39 AM
Creation date
7/15/2013 9:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2013 06 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Study Session Summary <br /> June 11,2013 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> gain the political perspective. Then, these real estate/land use professionals will <br /> share their feedback at a Public Meeting on June 12. <br /> Troy introduced Laura Aldrete of the TAP. She said that the TAP hoped to gain <br /> input from Council on McCaslin and how McCaslin relates to downtown, to US 36 <br /> and the rest of Louisville. <br /> Mayor Muckle said that the McCaslin corridor does not tie in to the walkability of <br /> the town. The McCaslin retailers are very important to the City. People want <br /> Louisville to remain a small town and McCaslin doesn't have that feel to it. <br /> Councilmember Loo said people moved here for space. The McCaslin area has <br /> beautiful vistas. Louisville residents are used to excellent services—the question <br /> is how do we continue to pay for them; no people = no new business = no <br /> increase of sales tax. <br /> Councilmember Sackett frequently visits businesses in the McCaslin area. It is a <br /> vibrant area. <br /> Councilmember Dalton would like to let things develop organically. If style and <br /> density aren't offensive, he is supportive. <br /> Councilmember Keany said for a long time, Louisville had the only grocery store <br /> in east County. Since then, in surrounding communities, grocery stores choices <br /> have quadrupled. Louisville has historically allowed limited signage but that is <br /> changing somewhat. There is an opinion that residential development does not <br /> pay its own way and/or that it does not pay as much as commercial development. <br /> Councilmember Yarnell asked if there is an immediate need to jump in and `do <br /> something." Do we need to alter the future of Louisville? Perhaps leave space <br /> undeveloped and see what happens. <br /> Public Comments: A few members of the public spoke regarding their opinions <br /> on the McCaslin Boulevard Corridor. <br /> Discussion from City Council included the following: <br /> • Superior has proposed a 1400 unit development—how will that impact <br /> Louisville? Centennial Valley has potential for entrepreneurial <br /> development. <br /> • It is inevitable that there will be growth in 10 years. We need to preserve <br /> the quality of life during that growth. <br /> • Bigger is not necessarily better. What does better mean? Connection to <br /> existing spaces, intersection improvements, trail connections, ability to <br /> attract people to increase sales tax, affordable housing for people, Seniors <br /> able to transition to smaller homes, preserve open space, pools, rec <br /> center, low crime. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.