My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2013 07 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2013 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2013 07 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:34 PM
Creation date
8/7/2013 7:59:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
7/16/2013
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2013 07 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 2, 2013 <br />Page 11 of 25 <br />well as new structures for vehicle and materials storage. The existing wastewater <br />treatment plant (WWTP) facilities would be integrated into the site plan. The pros and <br />cons of each are as follows: <br />Staying at Empire Road site: <br />+ City already owns property; project is fully funded and can proceed now <br />+ Maintains City operations in current location <br />— The site is constrained in many ways (5.4 acres of useable space); this creates <br />safety risks, reduces ongoing operating efficiency and limits future flexibility. <br />— New construction and staging will dramatically reduce operational area and <br />efficiency and will significantly reduce staff efficiency for at least one year <br />? Anticipated reconstruction of wastewater treatment plant may provide more site <br />flexibility or further constrain site <br />Moving to another site: <br />+ Unencumbered site would enable current and future flexibility including <br />addressing unanticipated needs <br />+ New complex can be built while continuing to operate out of the existing Empire <br />site. This minimizes disruption and maintains staff productivity <br />— Requires acquiring another site, taking that site off the tax rolls and limiting <br />business expansion in that location <br />— Added cost and funding constraints would delay project <br />Acquiring a new 8 to 10 acre site at current land prices of around $5.00 per square foot <br />would cost about $1.75 million to $2.2 million, and add this amount to total project costs. <br />City staff attended site visits to comparable facilities in the Denver area, which led all <br />staff involved to conclude before finalizing the design for the existing site, they should <br />further explore relocating the CSF to a larger, Tess encumbered site, which would allow <br />better circulation of equipment and staff and create a safer, more efficient and effective <br />working environment. <br />The CSF is the base of operations for dozens of staff and in some cases their only work <br />space. It must provide adequate space for numerous large vehicles to maneuver, be <br />loaded, worked on and stored. It must also provide efficient access to hundreds of <br />pieces of maintenance and construction equipment, thousands of spare parts and large <br />volumes of materials. The perception shared among staff is the CSF will likely serve as <br />home base for the next 30 to.50 years and perhaps longer. <br />Staff requested Council direction on whether they should explore other potential sites <br />for the CSF or to proceed with design and engineering work needed to construct a new <br />facility on the existing Empire Road site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.