My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2007 09 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2007 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2007 09 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2021 2:30:05 PM
Creation date
1/3/2008 11:46:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Quality Check
1/3/2008
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2007 09 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 18, 2007 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />City Attorney Light explained the Colorado Fair Campaign Act prohibits a <br />municipality from spending money to sway the electors from voting for or against <br />any measure other than passing a resolution in support or opposition to the <br />measure. He reviewed the to-rms of the Cooperation Agreement between the <br />City of Louisville and the Louisville Revitalization Commission and noted there is <br />no expressed provision for either party to unilaterally terminate. <br />Mayor Sisk explained no action will be taken on Resolution No. 52, Series 2007 <br />until the October 2, 2007 City Cc-uncil meeting. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Rob Lathrop, 601 Johnson Avenue, Louisville, CO stated his advocacy is for the <br />business community. He reported on conversations with local businesses who <br />want to know the City Councill's position on the issue. <br />John Leary, 1016 LaFarge Avenue, Louisville, CO stated the resolution should <br />not be considered and noted 'the Council's position is already on record. He <br />stated taxpayer's money cannot be used for promoting candidates or issues. He <br />declared the citizens reserve the right of initiated legislation. <br />David Waldman, 1871 Continental View Drive, Louisville, CO reported on his <br />discussions with citizens relative to Ballot Issue 2A and noted most voters do not <br />understand the issue. He urged Council to vote on the resolution this evening. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown explained one of the reasons for Resolution No. 52, is to <br />preserve the redevelopment of the Highway 42 area. He noted the Downtown <br />Business Association passed a motion unanimously opposing Ballot Issue 2A. <br />He announced a project in thE; downtown area, which was recently approved by <br />Council, has been put on hold as a result of Ballot Issue 2A. <br />Council member Marsella stained Ballot Issue 2A proposes to reverse a decision <br />made by Council. She supports the citizen initiative process, but not Ballot Issue <br />2A. She voiced her disappoir-tment the new downtown project was put on hold. <br />Mayor Sisk voiced his hope both sides of Ballot Issue 2A can be respectful of <br />each other, and felt it would be beneficial for both parties to discuss the issues. <br />MOTION: Mayor Sisk moved to continue Resolution No. 52, Series 2007 to <br />October 2, 2007, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Brown. All in favor. Absent: <br />Council member Muckle. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.