My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2013 10 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2013 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2013 10 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:34 PM
Creation date
10/16/2013 8:18:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/1/2013
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2013 10 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 1, 2013 <br />Page 9 of 15 <br />Council member Loo read the ballot language for Amendment 64, which allowed the <br />legalization of the retail sale marijuana, manufacturing and the regulations. She stated <br />the moratorium is necessary, to craft legislation to regulate retail shops and not <br />necessarily to put the question on the ballot. It gives the Council more time to work on <br />the legislation for regulations. She was pleased the democratic process really works. <br />Council member Yarnell stated it was clear that marijuana is here. She agreed the <br />moratorium is not a ban or a prohibition, but felt the moratorium would allow citizens to <br />decide on the issue. Her intent for the moratorium is to put the question on the ballot. <br />Council member Loo stated if a moratorium is passed this evening it is not a vote to put <br />it on a ballot. Planner I Robinson concurred. City Attorney Light explained if Council <br />passed the moratorium and wanted to put it on the ballot, it would take a separate <br />action at a later meeting. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the moratorium allows the Council more time to decide on <br />regulations or whether it should be put on the ballot. Although he may favor putting the <br />issue on the ballot, he supported drafting regulations for the current businesses to <br />convert. He noted operating a medical dispensary, which requires a prescription from a <br />doctor and a permit from the state, is different from operating a retail recreational <br />marijuana store. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated the City Council can ask staff to bring back regulations <br />for the possible conversion of the two existing medical marijuana businesses, if those <br />businesses choose to do so. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the two exiting medical marijuana businesses may choose to <br />convert or become a dual business. There would have to be some discussion later on <br />regarding the fate of the businesses if marijuana was banned. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Dalton moved to approve Ordinance No. 1643, Series 2013, <br />seconded by Council member Jasiak. <br />Council member Keany supported regulations for the existing medical businesses to <br />convert to retail businesses. He would support the moratorium but asked Council to put <br />regulations in place. He explained the Council had previous discussion on very stringent <br />regulations for retail marijuana sales. <br />VOTE: Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 7 -0. <br />Council Direction: Council directed staff to bring forward regulations to allow the <br />existing medical marijuana businesses to apply for a conversion of their license or apply <br />for a dual license. <br />There was a question as to whether the Planning Commission should further review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.