My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2013 08 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2013 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2013 08 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:21 AM
Creation date
11/15/2013 1:53:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2013 08 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 8, 2013 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br />Russell asked staff if the City could say no to any Main Street location. <br />Light stated it would not conform to the Use Table. <br />Tengler asked if other crops are restricted in the Agricultural (A) zone district. <br />Lipton asked how personal cultivation would be effected. <br />Light stated there is limit on the number of plants a person can have for personal use. <br />The city’s ordinance would not include that as part of the Retail Marijuana Ordinance <br />regulations. <br />Moline and Light discussed the buffer recommendation. Light stated these are all new <br />regulations. <br />Summary from Staff and Applicant: <br />None heard. <br />Closed Public Hearing – Planning Commission Discussion: <br />Moline stated he supports the staff recommendation. He also thanked staff for their <br />work on the ordinance. <br />Russell stated he supports the 1,000 foot buffer and would recommend the Commission <br />consider prohibiting the retail in Old Town. <br />O’Connell stated her support would be for something similar to the Liquor License <br />Authority. <br />Lipton stated that no matter what the Commission decides it will probably be revisited in <br />3 or 4 years. He expressed concerns with the third ‘Where As’ and requested it be <br />removed. He also supports not having retail in Downtown. <br />Tengler stated his support for the 1,000 foot buffer. He also believes the market will <br />regulate and prevent the clustering of the retail sites. <br />Brauneis stated he is comfortable with either the 500’ or the 1,000’ buffer. He also <br />stated he supports staff recommendation. <br />Russell stated he does not want the Downtown area to have retail marijuana locations. <br />He stated the use is not compatible with what the community has worked so hard to <br />establish. <br />Based on the discussion, Lipton requested an informal vote on the following: buffer <br />distance, Use Table, Downtown. <br />Lipton stressed to staff the importance of communicating the discussions the <br />commission has had regarding the ordinance. <br />Motion and Roll Call Vote: <br />Lipton moved and Brauneis seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 17, Series <br />rd <br />2013 as presented by staff with the one request to remove the third (3) Where As <br />paragraph. <br /> <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton Yes <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Ann O’Connell Yes <br />Cary Tengler Yes <br />Jeff Moline Yes <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.