Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> March 5, 2013 <br /> Page 10 of 14 <br /> and on to the Water Treatment Plants. The City's secondary source of water is the <br /> Colorado Big Thompson Basin. <br /> He presented graphs and statistics based on the past City's water consumption and the <br /> drought outlook. The model was based on the 2200 acre feet of water drawn from <br /> Boulder Creek during the 2002 drought. Normally the City's water consumption would <br /> be around 4000 acre feet per year. The CBT/Windy Gap water is based on water <br /> allocation and contingent upon the amount of water in the basin. He explained the City <br /> is currently in year two of a five year span for drought. They are watching closely the <br /> snowpack and monitoring the water supply projected by the Northern Colorado Water <br /> Conservancy District. It is anticipated the water allocations in years of continued <br /> drought, will dwindle, which would include the CBT and Windy Gap basins. A water <br /> supply reduction would result in drought management measures of water restrictions or <br /> drought rate surcharges. All the factors combined complete the Water Supply Index, <br /> which is included in the Drought Management Plan. <br /> He reviewed the water supply projections for 2013 and noted it is better than 2012 and <br /> then in 2002, but overall the current outlook is it will continue to be dry along the Front <br /> Range. They continue to track the snowpack and watch for precipitation in the spring. <br /> Research performed post 2002 drought showed high volume outdoor watering <br /> customers are best controlled through water restrictions as they tend to be less price <br /> sensitive to water bills and rate surcharges. Normal volume outdoor watering <br /> customers were more responsive to rate surcharges. The first targeted customers for <br /> water conservation, high volume users, are best controlled by water restrictions. Staff <br /> believes an incrementally flexible approach to drought management would best serve <br /> the interests of the City, its residents and businesses. Such an approach would begin <br /> with water restrictions and progress to rate surcharges as deemed necessary and in <br /> accordance with drought severity and stage guidelines outlined in the Plan. <br /> In anticipation of a drought year, staff recommended updating the Drought Management <br /> Plan to provide flexibility in water conservation tools for drought management. The <br /> proposed modifications to the 2004 Plan include: <br /> • Removing mandatory rate surcharges and making them discretionary allows staff <br /> to implement measures tailored to a specific drought and observed conservation <br /> outcomes rather than committed to a mandatory measure, which may or may not <br /> be effective. <br /> • Addition of a case-by-case surcharge exemption, which would protect customers <br /> from severe economic impacts resulting from water rate surcharges. The Plan <br /> primarily targets reduction in outdoor usage and aims to avoid detrimental <br /> impacts to customers who rely on water for commercial or manufacturing <br /> processes. <br /> • Organization, clarifications/updates to outdated information in the existing Plan. <br /> 33 <br />