My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2013 07 09
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2013 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2013 07 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:50:39 AM
Creation date
11/20/2013 1:12:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2013 07 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Study Session Summary <br /> July 09,2013 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> • 3 —4 birds for a minimum flock <br /> • 2 —3 sf per chicken of coop floor <br /> • 4 —5 sf per chicken in an outside run <br /> • Secure fences to keep chickens in and predators out <br /> • Feed secured in predator proof containers <br /> Councilmember Keany asked Troy what issues other municipalities have had. <br /> Troy said very few problems and he received largely positive feedback; nuisance <br /> concerns were managed. <br /> Councilmember Yarnell asked about the discrepancy between egg production <br /> and when the stop producing. Ms. Wilkinson said they have a life expectancy of <br /> 6 —7 years and produce for about 5 years. She said solutions are popping up: <br /> chicken rescues and for a fee, slaughtering and processing. Another member of <br /> public said hens have longer productivity. <br /> Councilmember Loo reminded everyone that beekeeping has strict regulations <br /> and doesn't want chickens to be less regulated than bees. <br /> Councilmember Jasiak commented that the LSAB did a great job on the white <br /> paper. She thinks the setback discussion is worth having. She would not like to <br /> trample on residents rights by requiring them to get neighbors permission to have <br /> chickens since we don't require that in order to have a dog. <br /> Ms. Wilkinson stated micro flocks are docile, good with children and animals. <br /> They are a pet that provides nutritious food. They are an opportunity to enjoy an <br /> animal that provides organic food and a family can control, from start to finish <br /> what the family is eating. <br /> She recognizes coops are a potential eyesore; however, people care about their <br /> homes and want to keep their homes attractive. <br /> A public forum, held May 6th 2013, was advertised in the Daily Camera. <br /> Concerns were identified as well as how to address concerns and education was <br /> provided to those who are opposed. <br /> Public comments: <br /> There is nutritional benefit from free range chickens and their wings can be <br /> clipped so they don't fly over the fence. <br /> Noise is minimal; they are noisiest when they are laying eggs (typically about 2 <br /> minutes per day) <br /> Regarding fence height: liken it to a shed. People do not want eyesores on their <br /> property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.