Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />August 20, 2002 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Brown noted that Council has struggled with the exemption of tavern licenses. He agreed <br />with Mr. Stout that creating a non-smoking environment would help people quit smoking. <br />He voiced his support of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Davidson asked Garrett McCarthy, if he was aware of public opinion on banning <br />smoking in outdoor patios. McCarthy voiced his support for the non-smoking issue, but <br />felt awkward imposing his views on the public. He thought many of his customers would <br />be in favor of the ban on smoking and the ordinance will help his business. <br /> <br />Davidson favored the exemption for private clubs. He addressed the issue of law-abiding <br />citizens being turned into criminals and stated that City regulations protect the public. He <br />commended the Smoking Task Force for their work. He emphasized that he is a <br />representative of all the people of the City of Louisville, and the people have voiced their <br />support of the ordinance. He stated he would support the ordinance with the exclusion of <br />private clubs. <br /> <br />Davidson called for further public comment. <br /> <br />Patricia Benson, Louisville Times Reporter, asked if the ordinance would cite people <br />smoking outside of a public building or on public sidewalks. <br /> <br />Davidson responded no. <br /> <br />Jim Hayden, Gentleman Jim's owner, asked if all the enforcement is left up to the bar and <br />restaurant owners, and if he would be arrested if someone smoked in his establishment. <br /> <br />City Attorney Sam Light explained there are a number of prohibitions, which apply to the <br />smoker and the proprietor of the business. The main prohibition is that no person shall <br />smoke or carry a lighted smoking instrument into a public place. That provision applies <br />to the smoker. With respect to the proprietor, they are obligated to post signage, and <br />asked smokers to stop smoking in a non-smoking area. If the smoker refuses to comply <br />with the proprietor's request, the proprietor is to report that situation to the police for <br />further investigation. <br /> <br />Hayden stated that if it were a health issue, why would private clubs be exempt. He stated <br />private clubs employees would be subject to second hand smoke. <br /> <br />Davidson stated smoking is being prohibited in public places. <br /> <br />Chuck Wright, 103 S. Washington Avenue, Louisville, CO, stated it should be a matter of <br />consent and if a person frequents a smoking establishment, they are consenting to <br />cigarette smoke. He stated the public has the right to determine whether or not they wish <br />to enter a smoking establishment and must take responsibility to investigate whether a <br />public establishment is smoking or non-smoking. He disagreed with government <br />controlling smoking in private businesses. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />