Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />December 2, 2003 <br />Page 11 of 22 <br /> <br />attend three open houses to discuss the South Sub-area. She stated the City had requested <br />that STK move forward with their comp plan amendment. She stressed it does not <br />require the City to approve any specific future development on StorageTek's property. It <br />is merely a comp plan amendment to provide a framework for future development. <br /> <br />Doug Grinbergs, 530 W. Sycamore Circle, Louisville, CO voiced his confusion with the <br />current process. He stated the City did not host any public meetings to receive citizen <br />input and the citizen's comp plan amendment is a reactionary action. He stated the <br />citizen's comp plan is not a substitute plan, merely a last minute effort to head off the <br />current plan going forward. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sisk requested a five minutes recess. Mayor Davidson declared a 5- <br />minute recess at 9:37 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 9:50 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCIL QUESTIONS <br /> <br />Council member Van Pelt asked for an explanation of the South Sub-Area Task Force. <br />Wood explained the South Sub-Area Steering Committee was established in 2002. They <br />met for approximately 7 months and disbanded in April of 2003. The Committee was <br />comprised of stakeholders in the South Sub-area, including: Avista Hospital, Monarch <br />Campus, CTC, and the St. Louis Catholic Church. There were also representatives from <br />the Council, Planning Commission and citizen representatives from each municipal ward. <br />A number of changes had occurred in the South Sub-Area, and there was an intention of <br />initiating a comp plan amendment. He noted the three primary working products of <br />development: a market study, transportation study, and a fiscal impact study. In April <br />Council asked the stakeholders to come forward with their intent of redevelopment and <br />rezoning and if a comp plan amendment was required, Staff would notify the stakeholder. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sisk asked if STK's 320 acres was zoned for residential. Wood stated <br />the current Industrial zoning of the 320 acres prohibits residential. A zoning amendment <br />would be required to permit residential. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sisk asked if StorageTek has ever filed a petition to annex the 80-acre <br />parcel to the City of Louisville. Wood responded no. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sisk asked Wood for a brief history of the current development of STK. <br />Wood stated there were two separate annexations that comprised the 320 acres. The first <br />was in the late 70's, the second in the 80's. The property was zoned Industrial. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sisk asked if the reference to residential applies to StorageTek. Wood <br />stated there is no provision for residential in the South Sub-Area Comp Plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sisk asked why the City and Boulder County jointly purchased industrial <br />property (Trillion) located to the east as open space. Land Management Director Cindy <br />Laus stated the purchase was for municipal buffers and agricultural preservation. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />