My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2013 12 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2013 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2013 12 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:34 PM
Creation date
1/8/2014 7:43:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/17/2013
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2013 12 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> December 17, 2013 <br /> Page 10 of 24 <br /> marijuana is not an exception for some individuals and may lead to chronic mental <br /> health problems. She stated although there may be tax collected from the sale of <br /> marijuana, there may be a substantial outlay of money to care for people who develop <br /> substance abuse problems. One concern is the type of marijuana produced today has <br /> a much higher concentration of more psycho- active ingredients. This is a major <br /> concern for persons in their teenage years because any substance, including marijuana, <br /> impairs the development of their brain. Marijuana effects memory, it prevents short <br /> term memories from long term memory storage. She asked Council to consider the <br /> information she provided. <br /> Tracy Haley, Louisville, CO voiced her support for marijuana legislation. She stated if <br /> alcohol is allowed in the City, marijuana should also be allowed. She stated marijuana <br /> is less destructive than alcohol and felt alcohol tends to produce violence, whereas <br /> marijuana does not. She suggested having at least as many retail marijuana stores as <br /> there are liquor stores and as many cultivation operations as there are breweries. She <br /> felt the Colorado Tech Center could provide an opportunity for cultivation. She felt the <br /> youth consumption would be more controlled in retail stores where ID's are scanned. <br /> She asked Council to consider the points she brought up. <br /> Health Harmon, Director of Programs for the Boulder County Public Health Department, <br /> 3415 N. Broadway, Boulder, CO, provided information about the health department's <br /> position relative to marijuana's harmful impact to the youth. He stated a few years ago, <br /> they conducted a comprehensive health assessment for Boulder County, which focused <br /> on improving the health of all Boulder County residents. Three areas rose to the top: 1) <br /> substance abuse, 2) healthy eating and 3) active living. <br /> Substance abuse was not strictly focused on marijuana; it also included alcohol and <br /> misuse of prescription drugs. They compared data for alcohol and tobacco to translate <br /> recommendations for marijuana. Their focus is on the impacts to the youth community <br /> and the long lasting impacts on their brains during the development period. He <br /> explained the level of impairment does not go after away after the usage of marijuana <br /> stops. He applauded the efforts of the Council to regulate marijuana. He offered his <br /> support and the recommendations for limiting the hours of operations; prohibiting <br /> market and distribution with logos; prohibiting coupons, free or give away and requiring <br /> scanners to verify age. He did not feel the recommendations were at odds with <br /> Amendment 64. <br /> He addressed the option concerning marketing and promotional hats and T-shirts and <br /> noted there are studies demonstrating youth use is likely to increase when receiving <br /> those promotional items. He stated with respect to the first amendment question, the <br /> option provided language directly from the Food and Drug Administration and so there <br /> is precedence. He noted many liquor stores are opting for scanners to verify age. The <br /> City of Boulder and Boulder County do require scanners in their regulations. With <br /> respect to the recommendation for the hours of operations, the City of Boulder, Boulder <br /> County and Denver County have the same hours of operations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.