My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 01 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2014 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 01 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:09 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 11:05:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2014 01 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Architecture <br />The proposed addition would be compatible but subordinate to the existing structure. <br />The addition would be shorter in height, tucking under the eave of the existing building. <br />It would have wood or cementitious siding that would match the appearance of the <br />existing building. The flat roof would differentiate the addition from the existing building <br />and would fit in with the architectural vernacular of Downtown Louisville. Much of the <br />front facade would be windows, would provide function for the intended use and comply <br />with the Design Handbook. <br />4. -d sq. i#a&r\ 41limNfrei> •---- <br />103r11F4461 4KIN L.10 4 <br />444 1 AO 1,4 <br />%PM Ol'Or mai 44 <br />Mak <br />cd,"- <br />"Mt WM, aaart, wri 45501 i Yule <br />f•MVVt, hII <br />fuse, J ' tite4 <br />rail% 'miter. <br />,TAirle"k i ° l,l rr _____ <br />_.i 1M. , rI4. •a <br />IIAIIfiIIIii <br />It <br />PIES <br />tR tr iLg iCIAKbr4 <br />r�ft ai <br />Mt <br />ceNittsfri■ 1-111 <br />Apa6 diS C#y411411L7 14Y4 31}0 rigf <br />r‘11/1C,..5. fr M?-p eseier_ 01.54, <br />comes <br />—WOW WC t#sAEII"x +y' ma* f'Krlyl <br />we* wrap }`LS [ ...,.:Ffi 'a+;4 ar4 'If-' i1 F I*T,. WYE r. .,,i r•�: <br />_ ':r (vo1-) tom iraia <br />The proposed PUD also includes changes to the facade of the existing building. The <br />proposal would enlarge the front windows to match their original size. It would also <br />replace the existing front door and add transom lights above it, again mimicking the <br />original design of the building. The proposed PUD includes minor repairs to other <br />existing features on the original building. The Historic Preservation Commission has <br />reviewed the proposal for historic and architectural compatibility and supports the <br />addition and modifications to the original structure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.