My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2014 04 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2014 04 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:11 PM
Creation date
4/18/2014 9:20:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2014 04 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 19, 2014 <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />Staff Presentation of Facts and Issues: <br />McCartney summarized the request for a lot coverage variance at 112 S. Carter Ct.: <br />▪ Background• <br />a. Located in Centennial Valley Filing #1 <br />b. Most lots in neighborhood are smaller than 7,000 SF <br />c. Zoned Residential Estate (RE) which requi 20% on a 12,000 SF <br />lot <br />d. This property has one of the smallest <br />e. Currently has 30% lot coverage <br />f. Needs variance for additional lot <br />floor area <br />▪ Staff believes criteria #3 and #6 have no <br />developable options. <br />▪ Staff recommends denial of this req <br />Questions from Board to Staff. <br />Niska asked if the two denied criteri. were based <br />house can have additional floor ar of lot cov <br />the neighborhood <br />rage not for additional <br />t because " - are other <br />same reason, which is the <br />McCartney answered in the affirmati <br />Malmquist stated the lot coverage is q <br />McCartney answered k1` ative. <br />Fuller asked if the �- deck w �•ver 30�¢hes in height. <br />McCartney answe the aff tive. He Hided the board that any deck over 30 <br />inches in height coin w- sf* e. <br />Ewy ask square foo . - was for <br />McC stated ifor �dj ional living area. <br />Fulle �ted the additiosqua otage adds another 4% on top of the existing 30% <br />covers <br />McCartney <br />RL standards <br />Ewy stated the e <br />established in the <br />district. <br />ffirmative. He added what staff is trying to do is mirror the <br />district. <br />is already smaller than the 7,000 SF lot area requirement <br />one district, so they even have a hardship for the RL zone <br />Applicant Presentation and questions from the Board to the applicant: <br />Leslie Meyer, owner, presented. She stated her and her husband love their house and <br />neighborhood but need more space because they have twin girls. They have <br />considered removing the deck but they love the views from the deck. She stated the <br />additional lot coverage will allow them to expand their living room enough to allow a <br />sectional couch. She added the existing living room is very small. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.