My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 05 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 05 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:25 AM
Creation date
5/12/2014 11:11:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2014 05 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: RETAIL BROKER ROUNDTABLE <br />DATE: MAY 12, 2014 <br />PAGE 2 OF 3 <br />• <br />elsewhere. <br />Ability to bring a project on line is critical; if you can't deliver that we will go <br />• Visibility and access is critical for retailer success. McCaslin has visibility and <br />access issues due to landscaping requirements and now overgrown and or <br />dense / overly mature landscaping. <br />• Parking requirements for the tenants are very important; restaurants are asking <br />for more parking while some big boxes are fine with 3 to 4 parking <br />spaces /1,000SF. <br />• Auto focused, traditional retail, is still a winner. Additionally, access and egress <br />issues in and out of sites are important. <br />• The lifestyle center concept has proven to not be a workable layout concept. A <br />lifestyle centers can only work with enough density to support it. <br />• Louisville is a tertiary market. Denver and Boulder are primary 1st tier markets, <br />Ft. Collins and Co. Springs are secondary. <br />• Retailers do not factor city boundaries in their site selection criteria. <br />• Louisville is not a regional retail center, but a community center. The 'barbells' <br />are Boulder and Westminster. Louisville retailers will tend to be daily needs types <br />of retailers. Louisville is perceived as a bedroom community. <br />• Density does drive retail, both rooftops and daytime population. Being high <br />density doesn't have to be the play. Louisville needs to decide what it wants to <br />be. <br />• Cannibalization is a very important issue to retailers. Adding another store in <br />Louisville or neighboring market can impact other stores nearby. <br />• Louisville should talk up the high incomes, high education. <br />• Incentives really help. Surrounding cities have lots of vacant land and are willing <br />to offer significant incentives. Louisville has to compete in this market. <br />• More residential units help retail. It was helpful and important to show that for <br />Louisville Plaza; that helped facilitate the sale of that property. <br />• One thing to help improve retail in Centennial Valley is to address the <br />landscaping that blocks visibility. <br />• Right now, McCaslin doesn't have a good story to tell (a broker said McCaslin is <br />a bad story). The 36 Corridor is losing to 1 -25 and is over retailed. 1 -25 corridor <br />is the preferred spot for retail today, it has lower cost land, and retailers can build <br />to spec. <br />• Figure out who you (Louisville) want to be then tell your (Louisville) story. <br />Louisville is not going to be high volume — gear the retail to what the community <br />is. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.