Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 20, 2014 <br />Page 11 of 20 <br />Planning and Building Director Russ pointed out any group using the Arts Center at <br />Memory Square would be able to use food trucks to serve an event inside the building. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Lipton asked about mobile ice cream trucks. Planning and Building <br />Director Russ said this would give them the format to apply and meet the Code. <br />Council member Keany asked about parks and could there be a food truck at a private <br />event. Planning and Building Director Russ replied it would depend on their zone <br />district. He stated each park is zoned differently. With a permit to use the public space, <br />a food truck could serve a private event. <br />Council member Stolzmann asked how to monitor if it was truly a private event and <br />what the penalty would be. Planning and Building Director Russ responded it would be <br />complaint driven. <br />Attorney Light saw no language in the ordinance automatically restricting future use if a <br />violation occurred. Enforcement measures could include a warning and explaining <br />consequences of municipal code enforcement through the municipal court. Hopefully, <br />this would provide disincentive to violate. <br />Council member Stolzmann was concerned about the impact on brick and mortar <br />businesses. Planning and Building Director Russ stated Planning Commission <br />discussed the Centennial Valley area extensively. They felt the 150' buffer in the <br />McCaslin area was sufficient and still kept the restaurants viable. <br />Mayor Muckle felt 30 days seemed like a lot of days for a food truck to operate. <br />Planning and Building Director Russ clarified they can apply for a 30 day period but <br />limited to 5 consecutive days of operation. <br />Mayor Muckle expressed concern over the use by right and asked if a food truck could <br />set up permanently in a parking lot. Planning and Building Director Russ stated if they <br />met the permit criteria, the answer was yes. It was looked at as a legal right to operate <br />in the City on private property. <br />Mayor Muckle asked for more public comment and hearing none, closed the public <br />hearing. <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br />Council member Lipton saw this as a reasonable solution to an issue the City has <br />wrestled with for some time. He felt it had been reviewed by the parties affected with no <br />negative reaction. If changes are needed later, it could be done legislatively. <br />