Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 07 21

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Nlinutes June 16, 2014 Page 6 of 11 since the property is being landmarked. Staff recommends this approach so all new construction would require a review by the HPC. Stewart asked what the site boundaries are for the landmark request. Johnson stated staff recommended landmarking the front part of the property, which defaults to landmarking the remainder of the property. Watson asked why the new construction can be considered for a grant. Robinson stated new construction is eligible under resolutions. He added we used this same process for 740 Front Street. He reminded the HPC there is not a grant application being considered for the new construction. Fahey asked if they would have to come back for review if they build anything new. Robinson stated they would need an alteration certificate. Fahey asked if we are reviewing the new building tonight. Robinson stated yes, but not as a grant request. Watson stated he still wasn't sure why the back portion of the existing structure had to be removed. Mark Zaremba, property owner, stated the structural assessment said it was unsafe and they recommended removing the structure. Watson asked who did the structural assessment. Johnson stated Scott Coburn. Stewart asked to include the assessment in the packet next time. Watson asked if the structural engineer was involved. Zaremba answered in the affirmative. Stewart stated this was also a demolition request. La Grave asked if the HPC was approving an Alteration Certificate and if it was based on the plans being reviewed tonight. Robinson answered in the affirmative. La Grave stated he liked the idea of preserving what can be preserved, but he is still trying to wrap his hands around all that is being requested.