Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />MeetingMinutes <br />October 10, 2013 <br />Page 3of 8 <br />None heard. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />McCartney presented from a Power Point explaining this project involved two separate <br />requests: <br />1.Request of a 3 year extension for the existing PUD; <br />2.Propose an optional site design, which would allow for phased development. <br />McCartney added the project is located in the CTC area, zoned industrial, and has had <br />a previous time extension. He added the new proposed development is an alternative <br />option: <br />Single story, 30 feet tall <br />83,291 SF <br />Could be built in two phases –northern most section would be built first. <br />Same access points, landscaping, and façade treatments <br />Staff recommends approval of the application <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Moline asked staff what the sidewalk situation is. <br />McCartney stated CTC has a sidewalk plan which requires a single sidewalk on only <br />one side of the road. The application complies with the existing layout. <br />Brauneis inquired about the water usage data. <br />Lipton asked about the water usage data and asked if Public Works reviews the water <br />supply for each development. <br />McCartney stated Public Works does review all of the plans for potential water usage. <br />Lipton asked if water usage increase requires an amendment to the PUD. <br />Russ stated it would not require an amendment, it would require an upgrade to the <br />water tap. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Wendell Picket, owner, stated he was in favor of staff’s presentation and <br />recommendation. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />None heard. <br />Public Comment: <br />None heard. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />None heard. <br /> <br />